A. I. Umirdinov, A. M. Xakimov xalqaro ommaviy huquq sud amaliyoti o‘quv-uslubiy qo‘llanma (keyslar to‘plami) toshkent – 2018

Shartnomalar huquqida xato tushunchasi – 1969-yilgi Vena konvensiyasida ham xato tushunchasiga to‘xtalib o‘tilgan bo‘lib, u shartnomani haqiqiy emas deb topish uchun mavjud bo‘lgan asoslardan biri hisoblanadi.
Shartnomalarni sharhlash – bu shartnomaga turli xil shaxslar tomonidan berilgan sharhdir va shartnomalarni hamma turlicha sharhlanishi mumkin.
Shartnomalarni talqin qilish – Sudlar vakolatiga berilgan bo‘lib, shartnoma moddalarining asl mazmun-mohiyatini aniqlash uchun amalga oshiriladi.
“Shartnomalar huquqi to‘g‘risida”gi Vena konvensiyasi – davlatlar o‘rtasida tuziladigan xalqaro shartnomalarni tartibga solish maqsadida 1969-yilda qabul qilinib 1980-yilda kuchga kirgan.

Sud ishlari ro’yxati

1. 
   Temple of Preah Vihear (Cambodia v. Thailand), Judgement, ICJ Reports 1962, p .6.
   
2. 
   The Alabama Arbitration Arbitral Award (1898), Alabama claims of the United States of America against Great Britain.
   
3. 
   Arbitration Comission, EC Conference on Yugoslavia, Opinion No 8, ILR, Vol.92, p. 199.
   
4. 
   Affaire du Vapeur “Wimbledon”, Arret, 1923, CPJI serie A No 1, Frontier Dispute, International Court of Justice Reports 2005,90 (12 July 2005)
   
5. 
   ICJ, Territorial Dispute (Libyan Arab Jamahiriya vs Chad) 1994.
   
6. 
   United States Diplomatic and Consular Staff in Tehran (United States of America v. Iran), Judgement, ICJ Reports 1980.
   
7. 
   Case Concerning the Military and Paramilitary Activities In and Against Nicaragua (Nicaragua vs United States), ICJ Reports 1986.
   
8. 
   Saluka investments vs Czech Republic, PCA decision 17. 03. 2006.
   
9. 
   Emilio Augustin Maffezini v. The Kingdom of Spain (ICSID Case No. ARB/97/7) 25.01.2000).
   
10. 
    ECtHR - Soering v. The United Kingdom, Application No. 14038/88, 7 July 1989.
    
11. 
    Exchange of Greek and Turkish Populations, Advisory Opinion, 1925 P.C.I.J. (ser. B) No. 10 (Feb. 21).
    
12. 
    Siemens A.G. v. The Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/02/8.
    
13. 
    Salini Costruttori S.p.A. and Italstrade S.p.A. v. The Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan, ICSID Case No. ARB/02/13.
    
14. 
    RosInvestCo UK Ltd. v. The Russian Federation, SCC Case No. V079/2005.
    
15. 
    Vladimir Berschader and Moïse Berschader v. The Russian Federation, SCC Case No. 080/2004.
    
16. 
    ECtHR - Ahmed v. Austria, Application No. 25964/94, 17 December 1996.
    
17. 
    ECtHR - Chahal v the United Kingdom (Application no. 22414/93).
    
18. 
    ECtHR - D. v. The United Kingdom, Application No. 30240/96, 2 May 1997.
    
19. 
    Manickavasagam Suresh v The Minister of Citizenship and Immigration and the Attorney General of Canada [2002] 1 S.C.R. 3, 2002 SCC 1.
    
20. 
    ECtHR – Saadi v. Italy, Application No. 37201/06, 28 February 2008.
    
21. 
    Legal consequences of the construction of a wall in the occcupied Palestinian territory, Advisory Opinion of ICJ 9 july 2004.
    
22. 
    Case concerning armed activities on the territory of the Congo Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Uganda) Judgment of 19 december 2005.
    
23. 
    Oxus Gold Plc v The Republic of Uzbekistan, UNCITRAL 2010 Rules 17 December, 2015.
    
24. 
    Metal-Tech Ltd. v Republic of Uzbekistan (ICSID Case No. ARB/10/3).