The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

 
 
 
 

---

 
 
 
 
 
Vocabulary 7-9 bands 
• 
Increase / incline / boom / surge / escalation / rise
• 
Demand / needs / requirements
• 
Exploring the fossil fuels
• 
Drilling of oil and gas 
• 
Mining / digging 
• 
Expanding the oil and gas reserves
• 
Oil and gas / fossil fuels / non renewable sources /
• 
Distant areas / far flung areas / inaccessible regions / undiscovered 
places 
• 
Quest / search / efforts / endeavors / attempts
• 
Repercussions / negative outcomes / consequences / results
• 
Biodiversity / flora fauna / vanish / threat / endanger / habitats / 
destruction
• 
Deforestation / clearance / extinct /
• 
Undertake projects / extraction projects /
• 
Intense / severe
• 
Financial support /
• 
Stabilize fuel prices / bring down the fuel prices / cut down
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

---

 
Some people believe famous people’s support towards international aid organizations 
draws attention to problems, whereas others think celebrities make the problems less 
important. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It is a debatable issue whether global aid agencies should take the help of renowned 
celebrities to raise public awareness towards them or such kinds of methods only bring 
counterproductive results. While some individuals think that the involvement of famous 
film stars, sportspersons and other billionaires might downplay the significance of the 
problems associated with aid agencies, I believe their assistance could bring enormous and 
positive changes to social issues.
On the one hand, there are various reasons why people assert that celebrities could also 
lessen the importance of problems. Firstly, most people are likely to associate the purpose 
of celebrities support with either enhancing reputation or gaining public attention and 
consequently neglect them by ignoring the pressing problems. Secondly, some celebrities 
especially those who are notorious for their bad deeds, are denounced by the public, so 
their sponsorship could even jeopardize the reputation of aid organizations and people will 
therefore be discouraged from lending a helping hand to those charities. Finally, people 
may loose interest in a charity if famous people stop their involvement and this could result 
in the loss of fundings which they may have generated otherwise.
On the other hand, I believe that famous people can raise awareness towards social 
problems. First and foremost, most celebrities are admired and respected by public and 
this contributes to increase the profile of aid organizations by virtue of which a growing 
number of people will donate money or volunteer to assist charities to solve their 
problems.
For instance, 
Priyanka Chopra, being a prominent actress, is
c
urrently the 
goodwill ambassador for UNICEF,
p
romoting child rights and drawing great deal of 
attention from her admirers. 
Apart from this, c
elebrities can also reflect social and 
environmental problems by creating songs and making films.
Last but not least, c
elebrities 
also draw media attention wherever they go
which h
elps to highlight the aid organization 
and the troubles which they are facing. 
In conclusion, although some entertainers with notoriety could also downplay the hitches 
linked with them, it seems to me that most celebrity’s assistance towards charities 
contributes to raising the awareness of problems due to their reputation.