The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

---

---

---

The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different
attractions in Brighton. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features 
and make comparisons where relevant. 
 
The polyline graph illustrates the proportion of visitors to England who went to four separate 
tourist attractions in Brighton between 1980 and 2010. 
Overall, it is clear that the percentage visiting the Pavilion and the Pier increased over the period. 
While the proportion of travellers to other attractions decreased. 
In 1980, only 10% of tourist to England went to Pier. Despite some minor fluctuations, this figure 
rose from around 9% in 1990 to 22% in 2010. The percentage visiting the Pavilion also increased, 
from approximately 23% in 1980 to almost 50% in 1995. However, this figure then decreased 
significantly, to about 35% in 2000 and then to roughly 31% in 2010, slightly higher than the 
Festival. 
The most popular Brighton attraction in 1980 for visitors to England was the Festival. Although 30% 
of these attended the Festival in 1980, by 2010 this percentage fell slightly to 28%. In 1980, the 
figure for tourists to the Art Gallery was 21%. It then grew to a peak of around 38%, before falling 
noticeably to exactly 20% in 1990. It continued to drop to less than 10% in 2010.
It was, therefore, the least popular attraction at the end of the period. 

---

The line graph shows the past and projected finances for a local authority in New 
Zealand. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and 
make comparisons where relevant. 
The polyline graph illustrates the financial position of a New Zealand local authority in millions 
from 2012 till the present and also shows the estimations till 2022.
Overall, it is clear that rates revenue and user charges are predicted to increase over the period. 
While, borrowings and grants and subsidies are likely to remain much lower. 
Rates revenue and user charges increased moderately till 2018 and they are forecasted to follow 
the similar pattern over the rest of the time frame. Rates revenue stood at just under 1.5 billion in 
2012, which was the highest of the four criteria. Though it remained stable for a year but then 
increased gradually until 2018, it is expected to climb to approximately 2.4 billion dollars in 2022. 
Like rates revenues, user charges are predicted to increase continuously. They began the period at 
1 billion and are likely to become twice by 2022. 
Borrowings, on the other hand, showed considerable fluctuations and are expected to do same in 
the following years. Initially, they rose dramatically to about 1200 million in 2014 and followed a 
drop of 600 million in 2016.After that although they increased steadily but they are predicted to 
reach at peak of just under 1.5 billion in 2020 and likely to finish the period at around the same 
level from where they began. Grant and subsidies were the lowest of the four, at under 500 million 
in 2012. Despite moving up to exceed borrowing briefly in 2016, this lowest value is forecasted to 
decrease marginally over the rest of the time period.

---