105 |
P a g e
“I think the problem is that a lot of academic environments have started to look like business
environments. And I think the academic environment is special, and needs its own
characteristics
.” (Resp. 11)
When structure really changes, the physical environment will need to be more flexible (Resp. 3).
However, Resp. 3 doubts if structure will really change. Resp. 6 also claims that nothing will change
within the academic organizations when implementing NWW, thus the physical environment, both
private and public, doesn’t change either. A fancy office environment will fit for ‘assembly line
academic work’, like data analyses, but not for concentration work (Resp. 3). At Erasmus University,
70 percent of work is claimed to be focus or concentration work, which means that open work
environments should not become the norm for academic organizations. A lot of universities where
the open office concept is already implemented are therefore labeled as semi-open, since they are
neither
closed nor open, whereby employees still have visual distractions all around them (Resp. 3).
A good model for the academic environment will be combi-offices, which are 10 by 10 feet offices
dotted around an open area. That way academics will bump into other faculty or students and
interact with them (Resp. 8). Therefore, the big differences with NWW are not in the individual office,
but about the use of public spaces. There are more informal lounges, interaction, collaboration, or
meeting spaces (Resp. 8). Academic environments become more like campuses, with open spaces
and in-house Starbucks, Coffee Companies or Albert Heijns, which will create an environment where
knowledge comes together (Resp. 10). When you place good facilities, people will get out of their
cubicle and talk to each other (Resp. 4). Currently, faculty offices are getting smaller and all the same
size. This is not driven by technology, but by space economics, since employees can easily move into
an office without the whole department having to move (Resp. 8).
The approach to implementation of NWW is the same for both the academic and the business
environment; organizations have to define employees’ work activities and what they need to support
this (Resp. 3; Resp. 7; Resp. 12). Consultation and conversations with end-users is thereby important,
to find out their work activities and corresponding needs (Resp. 12). Based on that outcome, you
need to facilitate different workplaces (Resp. 3; Resp. 7).
It must be noted that the physical environment is only of importance to a limited
degree for NWW; it
is more about leadership, culture, personalities (Resp. 7), mentalities, and behavior (Resp. 1).
However, when you create an environment that fulfills employees’ functional, social, and emotional
needs,
where people want to be, it can contribute to NWW (Resp. 7).
Most respondents have reported that the physical office layout in the academic environment will
change, since it has to fit with the newly formed organizational structure and culture due to NWW.
There is a stronger focus on public spaces such as lounges, meeting rooms, and collaboration areas.
Combi-offices centered around an open area or activity based workplaces seem to fit within the
academic environment, provided that the high degree of concentration work is taken into account.
The higher average age of academics and their above average opinionated nature makes the culture
change go in a slower pace than in the business environment. On the contrary, respondents claim
that the academic organization will most likely not change due to NWW, leaving the physical office
layout also unchanged.