Statement of intent literature review procedures and process

Name	Pre-test	Mean	Difference
Difference squared
1	Elboyeva Kamola	21	19	-2	-4
2	Hamidov Begzod	15	19	4	16
3	Komilova Sevara	22	19	-3	-9
4	Mahamatova Mahmuda	17	19	2	4
5	Ma’rufjonova Mohira	21	19	-2	-4
6	Muhammadjonova Aziza	15	19	4	16
7	Muhddinova Maftuna	18	19	1	1
8	Ozodov Javohir	22	19	-3	-9
9	Raxatalieva Kamola	22	19	-3	-9
10	Tohirova Sarvinoz	16	19	3	9
11	Xolmo’minov Azizbek	21	19	-2	-4
12	Xusanova Muyassar	22	19	-3	-9
13	Xo’jamqulov Chingizxon	16	19	3	9
14	Shodmonov G’olib	20	19	-1	-1
15	Shomahmudova Shoira	18	19	1	1

ANALYSIS OF THE POST-TEST (EXPERIMENTAL GROUP)
Finally, after 2 months practicum, the researcher came to the end of the experimental process and took post-test from both groups. In post-test stage, both groups namely experimental and control group pupils worked with different game methods and showed their speaking improvement. Table 15 illustrates the post-test results of experimental group.


Table15. The results of the Post-test 4”A”

№	Name	Gained score	Total score
1	Anvarjonov Musiddin	23	30
2	Ahmedov Ulug’bek	25	30
3	Davronov Mirjalol	21	30
4	Erkinov Sarvar	26	30
5	Kozimov Izzat	22	30
6	Madaminov Suhrob	25	30
7	Maksudxo’jayev Farxod	21	30
8	Maksudxo’jayev Jasur	26	30
9	Marksxonova Yulduz	23	30
10	Nizomov Bobomurod	27	30
11	Obidova Gulnigor	25	30
12	Olimova Nigina	24	30
13	Orziqulov Shaxboz	21	30
14	Rahimova Gulnoza	26	30
15	Rahmatullayeva Aziza	25	30

Figure25. The results of the Post-test 4”A”

Through the following formula the overall score is identified:
23+25+21+26+22+25+21+26+23+27+25+24+21+26+25
------------------------------------------------------------------------ = 24
15
As it is clear from the formula, the average score of the experimental group 4”A” from the post-test is 24 out of 30.
Table16. Frequency distribution of the Post-test 4”A”

Score value	Frequency
21	3
22	1
23	2
24	1
25	4
26	3
27	1

Figure26. Frequency distribution of the Post-test 4”A”

As the figure expressions that the lowest score is 21 was gathered by 3 pupils while the highest score 27 was gained by one student. One student took the score 22 whereas 2 of them gathered 23 score. Besides, the score 24 was gained by one student and the most 4 pupils took the score 25. The score 26 was gained by 3 pupils.
Table17. Post-test exam data 4”A”

Central tendency			Dispersion
Mean	Mode	Median	Mean	Mode	Median
24	25	24	24	25	24

Table18. The SD (standard derivation) of Experimental group 4”A”

№	Name	Post-test	Mean	Difference	Difference squared
1	Anvarjonov Musiddin	23	24	1	1
2	Ahmedov Ulug’bek	25	24	-1	1
3	Davronov Mirjalol	21	24	3	9
4	Erkinov Sarvar	26	24	-2	4
5	Kozimov Izzat	22	24	2	4
6	Madaminov Suhrob	25	24	-1	1
7	Maksudxo’jayev Farxod	21	24	3	9
8	Maksudxo’jayev Jasur	26	24	-2	4
9	Marksxonova Yulduz	23	24	1	1
10	Nizomov Bobomurod	27	24	-3	9
11	Obidova Gulnigor	25	24	-1	1
12	Olimova Nigina	24	24	0	0
13	Orziqulov Shaxboz	21	24	3	9
14	Rahimova Gulnoza	26	24	-2	4
15	Rahmatullayeva Aziza	25	24	-1	1

ANALYSIS OF THE POST-TEST (CONTROL GROUP)
Finally, the researcher came to the last step of the control group 4”B” and took post-test from them. Like the experimental group 4”A”, the test was taken in different game applied speaking methods. Table 19 illustrates the post-test results of the control group.
Table19. The results of the Post-test 4”B”

№	Name	Gained score	Total score
1	Elboyeva Kamola	23	30
2	Hamidov Begzod	24	30
3	Komilova Sevara	20	30
4	Mahamatova Mahmuda	24	30
5	Ma’rufjonova Mohira	25	30
6	Muhammadjonova Aziza	21	30
7	Muhddinova Maftuna	20	30
8	Ozodov Javohir	23	30
9	Raxatalieva Kamola	24	30
10	Tohirova Sarvinoz	21	30
11	Xolmo’minov Azizbek	25	30
12	Xusanova Muyassar	23	30
13	Xo’jamqulov Chingizxon	21	30
14	Shodmonov G’olib	26	30
15	Shomahmudova Shoira	21	30

Figure27. The results of the Post-test 4”B”

Through the following formula the overall score is identified:
23+24+20+24+25+21+20+23+24+21+25+23+21+26+21
------------------------------------------------------------------------ = 22.7
15
As it is clear from the formula, the score 22.7 out of 30 is the average score of the group.


Table20. Frequency distribution of the Post-test 4”B”

Score value	Frequency
20	2
21	4
23	3
24	3
25	2
26	1

Figure28. Frequency distribution of the Post-test 4”B”

The figure 28 shows the frequency of distribution of control group’s score value. According to the results 2 pupils took the lowest score 20 while only one student gathered the highest score 26. The score 21 was gained by 4 pupils whereas 3 of them took the score 23. The score 24 was gathered by 3 pupils while 2 of them took the score 25.