Part III: Discourse Resources and Meaning Construction
Content made available by Georgetown University Press, DigitalGeorgetown,
and the Department of Linguistics.
3. Sentences (23b)–(25b) are unacceptable in unmarked contexts. They could be-
come acceptable only in marked contexts. The usage of the directional verbs
in (b) therefore is considered marginalized. In analyzing the directional verbs
under investigation in this study, we take into consideration only unmarked
contexts.
REFERENCES
Anttila, Raimo. 1972.
An introduction to historical and comparative linguistics.
New York: Macmillan.
Atlas, Jay David, and Stephen C. Levinson. 1981. It-clefts, informativeness and logical form: Radical
pragmatics. In
Radical pragmatics
, ed. Peter Cole, 1–61. New York: Academic Press.
Detges, Ulrich. 2000. Time and truth: The grammaticalization of resultatives and perfects within a theory
of subjectification.
Studies in language
24, no. 2:345–77.
Givón, Talmy. 1989.
Mind, code and context: Essays in pragmatics.
Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum
Associates.
Heine, Bernd. 2002. On the role of context in grammaticalization. In
New reflections on
grammaticalization
, ed. Ilse Wischer and Gabriele Diewald, 83–101. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Hopper, Paul J., and Elizabeth Closs Traugott. 1993.
Grammaticalization.
Cambridge: Cambridge Univer-
sity Press.
Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. 1980.
Metaphors we live by.
Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Langacker, Ronald W. 1987.
Foundations of cognitive grammar, vol. 1: Theoretical prerequisites.
Stan-
ford: Stanford University Press.
Thepkanjana, Kingkarn, and Satoshi Uehara. 2004. Semantic types of resultative predicates in Thai.
Pro-
ceedings of the eleventh annual meeting of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society.
May 16–18,
2001. Bangkok, Thailand.
———. In press. Directional verbs as success markers in Thai: Another grammaticalization path. In
The
Tai-Kadai languages,
ed. Anthony Diller and Jerold Edmondson
.
London: Routledge.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1982. From propositional to textual and expressive meanings; some seman-
tic-pragmatic aspects of grammaticalization. In
Perspectives on historical linguistics
, ed. Winfred P.
Lehmann and Yakov Malkiel, 245–71. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
———. 1986. From polysemy to internal semantic reconstruction.
Proceedings of the twelfth annual
meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society,
539–50. Berkeley, Calif.: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
———. 1988. Pragmatic strengthening and grammaticalization.
Proceedings of the fourteenth annual
meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society,
406–16. Berkeley, Calif.: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
———. 1989. On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: An example of subjectification in semantic
change.
Language
65:31–55.
———. 1990. From less to more situated in language: The unidirectionality of semantic change. In
Papers
from the fifth international conference on English historical linguistics
, ed. Sylviv Adamson, Vivien
Law, Nigel Vincent, and Susan Wright, 496–517. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs, and Ekkehard König. 1991. The semantics-pragmatics of grammaticalization
revisited. In
Approaches to grammaticalization, vol. 1: Focus on theoretical and methodological is-
sues
, ed. Elizabeth C. Traugott and Bernd Heine, 189–218. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
PRAGMATIC INFERENCING IN GRAMMATICALIZATION: A CASE STUDY OF DIRECTIONAL VERBS IN THAI
187
Content made available by Georgetown University Press, DigitalGeorgetown,
and the Department of Linguistics.
IV
Language and Identity
Content made available by Georgetown University Press, DigitalGeorgetown,
and the Department of Linguistics.
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: |