Pernilla Hallonsten Halling

Parts of speech and dependent clauses: A typological study. PhD dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
Van Valin, Robert D. 2005. Exploring the syntax-semantics interface. Cambridge: Cam- bridge University Press.
Verkerk, Annemarie. 2009. A semantic map of secondary predication. Linguistics in the Netherlands 26. 115–126.
Veselinova, Ljuba. 2012. Random samples. In WSK dictionary on theories and methods in linguistics, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Viitso, Tiit-Rein. 1998. Estonian. In Daniel Abondolo (ed.), The Uralic Languages, 115–148. London-New York: Routledge.
Wälchli, Bernhard. 2009. Motion events in parallel texts: A study in primary-data typol- ogy. Habilitationsschrift: University of Bern.
Washio, Ryuichi. 1997. Resultatives, compositionality and language variation. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 6(1). 1–49.
Watkins, Laurel. 1980. A grammar of Kiowa. Ann Arbor: University Microfilms Interna- tional.
Watkins, Laurel. 1984. A grammar of Kiowa. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press. ILL: Uppsala.
Watters, David E. 2002. A grammar of Kham. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Wetzer, Harrie. 1996. The typology of adjectival predication. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Whelpton, M. 2006. Resultatives in Icelandic – a preliminary investigation. URL http:
//ling.auf.net/lingBuzz/000292.
Wiedemann, Ferdinand Johann. 1973. Estnisch-Deutsches Wörterbuch. Tallinn: Valgus. Winkler, Susanne. 1997. Focus and secondary predication. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1953. Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Blackwell. Zadeh, Lotfi A. 1965. Fuzzy sets. Information and control 8(3). 338–353.

Zadeh, Lotfi A. 1996. A note on prototype theory and fuzzy sets. Cognition 291–297. Zagona, Karen. 1990. Mente adverbs, compound interpretation, and the projection prin-
ciple. Probus 2. 1–30.
Zwicky, Arnold. 1995. Why English adverbial -ly is not inflectional. Papers from the 31st regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society 523–535.