Ijdiie volume: 01 Issue: 05

IJDIIE Volume: 01 Issue: 05 | December 2020
282
Published by “ INTER SCIENCE" http://ihm.iscience.uz/index.php/ijihm 
LITERATURE REVIEW 
As it has been mentioned above, there have been number of researches and assumptions 
concerning to this field. The main tasks of Typology have previously never been addressed because 
there are many opinions relating to this question. According to Utkir Yusupov ( 2013) ,there are 
following tasks of the science: 
- classification of the languages of the world
- to demonstrate linguistic universals ( linguistic process existing in all languages), 
dominants(linguistic features which exist in most of the language of the world), frequent units), 
uniques (linguistic phenomenon existing in one and two languages).
- to form types of forms 
- to calculate metalanguages for comparing languages.
Beside this, a large number of existing studies in the broader literature have examined that 
Comparative Typology outlines following tasks : the problems of comparative analysis of all 
language aspects such as phonetics, morphology, syntax, lexicon, and phraseological of related and 
non-related languages according to the linguistic and non-linguistic viewpoints; categorization of 
languages; investigations of Comparative Stylistic and Lexicology and intercultural communication 
(I.M Rasulova, Z.I Shukurova, 2017, p13). Typological classification is the study if language 
universals of languages which are quite similar each other. While classifying languages 
typologically, the structure of language is paramount (Matti Miestamo, 2018). 
According to Dr. Buranov’s viewpoint, there are four classifications of Comparative Typology:
1.
 
Genetic typology
finds out similarity and differences of languages according to their 
genetic aspects in diachronic and synchronic ways. This type of typology in general 
linguistics is called the Historical-Comparative Method in Linguistics.