Ijdiie volume: 01 Issue: 05

IJDIIE Volume: 01 Issue: 05 | December 2020
283
Published by “ INTER SCIENCE" http://ihm.iscience.uz/index.php/ijihm 
5) The volume of investigation;
6) The guidance of analysis. 
RESEARCH METHOD 
The process of conducting the research, the descriptive and comparative were implemented. 
The purpose of the present study to examine : 
-
to obtain information about history and types of Comparative typology
 
-
to analyze factors of typological analysis of two languages, Uzbek and English languages
 
In order to reveal some aspects of typological analysis, descriptive method was employed as 
well.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 
As it has been claimed above there six factors of conducting typological investigation: 
1. According to the amount analyzed languages, scholars divide it into Universal and Special 
Typology. Universal typology is aimed at analyzing the languages of the world in order to discover 
language universals standard to all mankind. Special typology is directed to exact languages; more 
often two languages are analyzed. These languages may be either cognate (kindred) or non-cognate 
(non-kindred). For example, while investigating English and Uzbek languages the researcher may 
find out some similar features such as Part of speech, plural forms and others. However, if two 
define languages are analyzed, only their specific features which are correspond each other will be 
revealed.
2. According to the reach or quantity of investigated material General and Special Typology 
may be classified .General typology studies language types, for instance, the most common 
characters of the language structure, usually in relation to a determined aspect: sound structure, 
morphological structure, syntactical structure of sentences. Special comparative typology 
investigates specific aspects and elements of language structure. For instance, we distinguish 
between phonetic, morphological, semantical, stylistic typology within which the investigation can 
be narrower: typology of phonetic systems, of word-building models, word order, grammatical 
categories, such as number, tense, mood, and others.
3. According to purpose of investigation, we may divide it into Classifying and Characterising 
Typology. Classifying typology reveals typological classification of languages, indicating their 
typological groups and correlation. But the object of characterising typology is to show particular 
features of the given language, its peculiarities among other languages.
4. According to the feature of the discovered differences, we may divide into Qualitative and 
Quantitative Typology. While comparing the given languages two types of divergences may be 
found: qualitative divergence and quantitative divergence: 
a) In qualitative divergence, we do not observe linguistic phenomena in some languages 
which exist other languages. For example, articles exist in English and Spanish languages but we do 
not face them in Uzbek and Russian languages. 
b) In quantitative divergence, we can face a particular phenomenon in both languages, but it 
is used differently in two languages. For example, word order exist in both Uzbek and English 
languages but it is changeable in the Uzbek language while in English it is constant. 
5. According to the volume of investigation, we may distinguish Structural and Functional 
Typology. Structural typology deals with types of language expressions. Functional typology 
analyzes how to employ these types in speech. 
6. According to the direction of investigation, we can distinguish between Semasiological and 
Onomasiological Typology. Semasiological typology deals with the comparative facts of languages 
from form to meaning and function. For instance, plural forms indicate different meaning in 
English and Uzbek languages. Onomasiological typology investigates language facts from meaning 

---