Nargiza kasimova farkhod mukhamedov elkan harebov


 The Role of Public-Private Partnerships in the Development of



Download 1,61 Mb.
Pdf ko'rish
bet22/63
Sana26.06.2021
Hajmi1,61 Mb.
#101946
1   ...   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   ...   63
Bog'liq
MONOGRAPHY Social and Economic Development (3)

1.3. The Role of Public-Private Partnerships in the Development of 
Infrastructure of the Russian Economy 
 
The effectiveness of specific areas of stimulating business participation in 
the development of public-private partnerships in the implementation of capital-
intensive projects can be achieved only because of their close interaction. The 
key areas, in our opinion, which should be the development of organizational 
mechanisms of the public-private partnership system and their normative 
consolidation, government participation in financing the most socially and 
economically  significant projects, providing guarantees for commercial risks, 
simplifying the process of creating reserve funds. 
Based on the results of studies of foreign experience and analysis of 
problem areas of the Russian economy, promising areas for the development of 
public-private partnerships in Russia are identified. Representatives of the 
development of public-private partnerships are most interested in the formation 
of a common environment in the development of transport infrastructure. 
It has been established that the problem of assessing the effectiveness of a 
public-private partnership project is to determine its level of profitability. 
Note that in the practice of economic analysis, the main indicators of 
assessing the economic efficiency of investment projects are (Казанцев  и 
Миндели, 2010): 
 
15 


- total or average annual profit that the company receives when 
implementing a public-private partnership project 
- return on investment or a simple rate of return 
- payback period, that is, the term return on investment with venture 
financing 
So, total profit is defined as the difference between monetary results and 
costs caused by the implementation of the public-private partnership project 
(Казанцев и Миндели, 2010): 
𝑛𝑛 = �(𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶
𝑡𝑡
− 𝑇𝑇𝐶𝐶
𝑡𝑡
)
𝑚𝑚
𝑡𝑡=0
, 
where 𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶
𝑡𝑡
 is the cost estimate of the results obtained by the venture investor 
from his project during the time interval 𝑡𝑡; 𝑇𝑇𝐶𝐶
𝑡𝑡
 is  total costs incurred by the 
venture investor during the time interval 𝑡𝑡; 𝑚𝑚 is the number of intervals during 
the investment period, i.e., the life cycle period of the public-private partnership 
project. 
Note that the average annual profit is an indicator that determines the 
average amount of net profit received by a venture investor during the year: 
𝑛𝑛
𝑟𝑟
=
1
𝑇𝑇 × �
(𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶
𝑡𝑡
− 𝑇𝑇𝐶𝐶
𝑡𝑡
)
𝑚𝑚
𝑡𝑡=0
, 
where 𝑇𝑇 is the duration of the investment period, years. 
A public-private partnership project can be considered economically 
feasible if these indicators are positive, otherwise the project is unprofitable. 
Note that the return on investment indicator can be defined as the ratio of 
annual profit to venture investments invested in the project (Казанцев  и 
Миндели, 2010): 
𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅 =
𝑃𝑃
𝑅𝑅 ,
 
where 𝑃𝑃 is the profit from the project; 𝑅𝑅 is initial investment in the project. 
Note that for investment projects characterized by a constant net income 𝑃𝑃
0
 
and one-time capital investments in the public-private partnership project 𝑅𝑅, the 
payback period 𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃 can be determined by the formula (Казанцев  и  Миндели, 
2010): 
𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃 =
𝑅𝑅
𝑃𝑃
0
=
1
𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅.
 
Based on this expression, you can approximately  estimate the payback 
period, using for this an indicator of return on investment. 
 
16 


It should be noted that the higher the probability of obtaining low incomes, 
the riskier the project itself. And the riskier the project, the higher should be the 
rate of return for such a project. 
Note that when choosing from a variety of options, investing in venture 
capital is often limited only to abstract considerations such as “this project 
seems less risky” or “in this case, the profit is greater, but the risk, it seems, is 
greater.” At the same time, the degree of risk in most cases can be accurately 
estimated, and the profitability of the proposed public-private partnership project 
corresponding to this risk can also be determined. Thus, analyzing the results 
obtained, the venture investor can not only choose the most attractive way for 
him to invest venture capital, but also significantly reduce the degree of possible 
risk. 
Basically, the probability theory is used to carry out the necessary 
calculations. According to this theory, each event is associated with a certain 
quantity that characterizes the possibility that an event will occur, while p is the 
probability of this event. If this event cannot occur under any conditions, its 
probability is zero, that is, 𝑝𝑝 = 0. If this event occurs under any conditions, its 
probability is 1. When, because of  the experiment, it was established that an 
event occurs in n cases from 𝑁𝑁, then the probability 𝑝𝑝 = 𝑛𝑛/𝑁𝑁 is mapped to it. 
The total sum of the probabilities of all events that may occur because of some 
observation should be equal to 1. Enumeration of all possible events with their 
corresponding probabilities is called the probability distribution in this 
experiment. 
We agree with the opinion of M. Naychuk-Khrushch  (Найчук-Хрущ, 
2011) that the economic evaluation of the effectiveness of financing a public-
private partnership project (venture financing) can be carried out on the basis of 
the following model (Figure 1). 
The main criterion for assessing the effectiveness of investment projects 
and the feasibility of investing by venture investors is the ability of a future 
company to grow rapidly. Obviously, the financial risk of a venture investor can 
only be justified by appropriate remuneration, which provides that the return on 
invested capital will be much higher. Venture investors strive to be sure that the 
potential future income from the project will be sufficient to cover the costs 
incurred. 
Depending on the results obtained on public-private partnership projects 
and the costs of financing them, the following main effects can be distinguished 
(Казанцев и Миндели, 2010): 
- economic (the economic result from the implementation of innovations 
and the result taken into account in the financial indicators of companies) 
- scientific and technical (novelty, utility of the result of innovation) 
- social (social results of the implementation of innovations) 
- environmental (the effects of innovation on the environment) 
 
17 



Download 1,61 Mb.

Do'stlaringiz bilan baham:
1   ...   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   ...   63




Ma'lumotlar bazasi mualliflik huquqi bilan himoyalangan ©hozir.org 2024
ma'muriyatiga murojaat qiling

kiriting | ro'yxatdan o'tish
    Bosh sahifa
юртда тантана
Боғда битган
Бугун юртда
Эшитганлар жилманглар
Эшитмадим деманглар
битган бодомлар
Yangiariq tumani
qitish marakazi
Raqamli texnologiyalar
ilishida muhokamadan
tasdiqqa tavsiya
tavsiya etilgan
iqtisodiyot kafedrasi
steiermarkischen landesregierung
asarlaringizni yuboring
o'zingizning asarlaringizni
Iltimos faqat
faqat o'zingizning
steierm rkischen
landesregierung fachabteilung
rkischen landesregierung
hamshira loyihasi
loyihasi mavsum
faolyatining oqibatlari
asosiy adabiyotlar
fakulteti ahborot
ahborot havfsizligi
havfsizligi kafedrasi
fanidan bo’yicha
fakulteti iqtisodiyot
boshqaruv fakulteti
chiqarishda boshqaruv
ishlab chiqarishda
iqtisodiyot fakultet
multiservis tarmoqlari
fanidan asosiy
Uzbek fanidan
mavzulari potok
asosidagi multiservis
'aliyyil a'ziym
billahil 'aliyyil
illaa billahil
quvvata illaa
falah' deganida
Kompyuter savodxonligi
bo’yicha mustaqil
'alal falah'
Hayya 'alal
'alas soloh
Hayya 'alas
mavsum boyicha


yuklab olish