Issn: 1533-7812 Vol-21-Issue-05-May-2020

 
CONCLUSION 
Interlingual interference can be both strong and weak. The weak interference 
disappears very quickly after practicing a number of tasks. The strong interference 
is long living that demand longer time and a lot of activities to get rid of.
With the spread and development of English around the world, English is used as a 
second language and for some people the 1st language. It enjoys a high prestige in the country. 
At present the role and status of English in Uzbekistan is higher than ever as evidenced by its 

---

Academic Leadership (Online Journal
 )
 
ISSN: 1533-7812 
Vol-21-Issue-05-May-2020 
P a g e
| 123 
position as a key subject of medium of instruction, curriculum. As the number of English 
learners is increasing different teaching methods have been implemented to test the effectiveness 
of the teaching process.
So the future teacher of English as a foreign language should not only be 
fluent in the language, understand its structure deeply and correctly from a 
linguistic point of view, but also clearly understand those aspects of the English 
language that bring this language closer and, on the contrary, distinguish it from 
the native student, and know the interference potential of interlingual differences, 
interlingual interference results and ways to overcome them. 
 
REFERENCES 
1.
Abdullayeva M.A. About typology of mistakes in the English speech of linguistic 
faculty students. Vestnik Chuvashskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo 
unversiteta imeni I.Ya.Yakovleva. № 4. 2015. P.90-99. 
2.
Baryshnikova I.V., Emets, T.V., & Vtorushina, Y.L. (2018) Operational system to 
prevent the native language interference in teaching English language the students-
bachelor degree holders as per pedagogical course. 
Perspektivy nauki i 
obrazovania – Perspectives of Science and Education. 
36 
(6), 173-181. doi: 
10.32744/ pse.2018.6.19.
3.
Ilyasov I.О., Rashidova D.R., Musaeva Z.I. The problem of defining the typology 
of lexical mistakes of the national university students during teaching English // 
izvestiya Dagestanskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. 
Psihologo-pedagogicheskiye nauki. № 4. 2014, P.103-105
4.
Lado P. Linguistics above the culture border. // Novoye v zarubedznoy ligvistike, 
vyp. XXV. Kotrastivnaya ligvistika. – М. 1989, P.33 — 62.
5.
Malinin A.B., Nefedov, O.V. (2015) Correcting students’ mistakes in learning 
foreign languages. Ispravleniye oshibok studentov pri izuchenii inostrannyh 
yazykov. // Filologicheskiy aspect. № 7. P. 34-40.
6.
Peryligin A.I. Ways of neutralization of grammar interference. Sposoby 
neytralizasii grammaticheskoy interferensii. Ucheniye zapiski orlovskogo 
gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Gumanitarniye I socialniye nauki. № 5. 
2012. P.237-240. 
7.
Vertogradskaya E.A. Disclosure of the semantics of foreign language grammatical 
forms. 
Rakrytiye 
semantiki 
inoyazychnyh 
grammaticheskih 
form//
Psihologicheskie i psiholingvisticheskiye problem vladeniya I ovladeniya 
yazykom. М., 1999, P.118-125: 122. 
8.
Yusupov U.K. Theoretical bases of comparative linguistics. Tashkent: Fan. 2007. - 
126 p.