Globalization and cross-border mobility
21
is a branch campus of a foreign university. MNCs are more willing
to recruit people who have
certi
fi
cation from the universities of their parent countries. The liberalization policies followed by
developing countries in the 1990s have attracted high levels of foreign direct investment as well as
the migration of
fi
rms and jobs. The demand for foreign degree holders in these sending countries
has increased. This has been an incentive to invest in cross-border higher education.
Another motivation for seeking cross-border education is for a better quality of education. A degree
from a good university is an attractive proposition to students. The continuing
fl
ow of
students from
developing countries to developed countries is also due to the belief that the quality and standards
of higher education studies offered in universities in the OECD countries are superior to those
offered in the country of origin. One can
fi
nd a positive association between the global ranking of
universities and the preferred destination of students for their studies abroad. Universities in the
USA occupy the top positions in the global ranking, which encourages
many students to apply to
universities in the USA. Students in Arab countries migrate to Egypt and Jordan to pursue their
higher education studies. A large number of students from Bangladesh and Nepal travel to India
to pursue their higher education studies. Similarly, students from mainland China seek higher
education in Hong Kong (Li and Bray, 2007).
There are exceptions to this pattern. For example, it is found that only
a small share of students
sitting for competitive examinations in India actually gain admission to some of the prestigious
institutions, such as the Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) or the Indian Institute of Management
(IIM). Those who do not get admitted to these institutions seek cross-border education as their
next best option.
International Institute for Educational Planning www.iiep.unesco.org
22
5
The economic crisis and its implications for higher education
and employment
Many countries affected by the economic crisis are struggling to develop strategies to arrest the
adverse effects of job and income loss on their citizens. How does the crisis
affect the development
of higher education in general, and that of cross-border education in particular? Many crises in
the past emanated from public sector investment/savings de
fi
cits, leading to large-scale budget
de
fi
cits and borrowing. The East Asian economic crisis was different from the earlier crises. Private
sector borrowing and
fi
nancial companies and their lending were responsible for the East Asian
economic crisis of 1998-1999 (Stiglitz, 1998). The current crisis has
many similarities with the
East Asian economic crisis: It started from the
fi
nancial system and it has affected
fi
rst professional
and white collar jobs. However, it is different from the past crisis in that the
fi
nancial systems of
the developed countries are responsible for the crisis, which is global in its reach,
as it spreads
to both middle- and low-income countries (World Bank, 2008). Some of the manifestations of the
crisis give scope for speculation, which is attempted below.
The leading economies of the world are experiencing the most severe crisis since the great
depressions of the 1930s and the crisis is changing the economic and employment outlook.
According to the International Monetary Fund (IMF), global growth has come to a virtual halt, with
the developed economies expected to shrink by 2 per cent in 2009. The World Bank President
and IMF Managing Director said that “the crisis has become global and no country could escape
it” (
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: