Teacher skills, attitudes, and
placement
•
Teachers are not literate in
languages their students
speak; have little training in
teaching L1 as subject or
teaching content in L1
•
Teachers are unfamiliar with or
opposed to instruction in L1 or
children’s familiar languages
because they did not
experience it themselves
•
Teachers lack knowledge
regarding bilingual and
multilingual education
pedagogy
•
Education systems can provide teachers with information about the
benefits of teaching in familiar languages and taking an L1-based
approach to instruction. Teachers’ unions and in-service training
opportunities present opportunities to share and discuss information.
•
Education systems can provide at least part of pre- and/or in-service
teacher training through the languages in which teachers will be
providing instruction. Training opportunities on literacy acquisition,
language development, and bilingual methodologies can be provided
so that teachers feel prepared to teach in L1-based, multilingual
classrooms.
•
Organizing L2/Lx subject teaching by specialized teachers can help to
maximize resources, minimize costs, reduce the burden on teachers
to be both language and subject experts, and improve the quality of
teaching.
•
Policies and practices related to teacher recruitment and placement
can be reviewed and updated through a consultative process to
ensure that teachers are placed in schools where they speak their
students’ language, while being sensitive to concerns for teacher
mobility.
Complexity and cost
•
Too many languages to
provide L1-based instruction to
all
•
Too complicated to provide
instruction in multiple
languages
•
Too expensive to provide
instruction and materials in
multiple languages
•
Language mapping can accurately identify the number of languages
needed. Often a majority of the population can be reached by a
handful of languages.
•
In urban or other heterogeneous language communities, school-
based language mapping and local decision-making can identify
which language(s) to use; in some contexts, a language of wider
communication in which children are proficient may be feasible to use.
•
Education systems can phase in use of different languages as
orthographies are standardized, materials are developed, teachers
are trained, and experience is gained within the sector.
•
Cost-benefit analyses indicate that initial start-up costs are recovered
through higher retention rates and better learning outcomes when
pupils learn and stay in school. Most significant recurrent costs in the
education sector (e.g., teacher salaries and infrastructure) are not
related to LOI.
•
Cost efficiencies can be realized through systematic planning of
materials production; for example, materials developed in one
language may be translated or adapted without incurring significant
5
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: |