CHAPTER IV.
One of the conditions under which our friend had gone upon the stage was not
acceded to by Serlo without some limitations. Wilhelm had required that
“Hamlet” should be played entire and unmutilated: the other had agreed to this
strange stipulation, in so far as it was possible. On this point they had many a
contest; for as to what was possible or not possible, and what parts of the piece
could be omitted without mutilating it, the two were of very different opinions.
Wilhelm was still in that happy season when one cannot understand how, in
the woman one loves, in the writer one honors, there should be any thing
defective. The feeling they excite in us is so entire, so accordant with itself, that
we cannot help attributing the same perfect harmony to the objects themselves.
Serlo again was willing to discriminate, perhaps too willing: his acute
understanding could usually discern in any work of art nothing but a more or less
imperfect whole. He thought, that as pieces usually stood, there was little reason
to be chary about meddling with them; that of course Shakspeare, and
particularly “Hamlet,” would need to suffer much curtailment.
But, when Serlo talked of separating the wheat from the chaff, Wilhelm would
not hear of it. “It is not chaff and wheat together,” said he: “it is a trunk with
boughs, twigs, leaves, buds, blossoms, and fruit. Is not the one there with the
others, and by means of them?” To which Serlo would reply, that people did not
bring a whole tree upon the table; that the artist was required to present his
guests with silver apples in platters of silver. They exhausted their invention in
similitudes, and their opinions seemed still farther to diverge.
Our friend was on the borders of despair, when on one occasion, after much
debating, Serlo counselled him to take the simple plan, — to make a brief
resolution, to grasp his pen, to peruse the tragedy; dashing out whatever would
not answer, compressing several personages into one: and if he was not skilled in
such proceedings, or had not heart enough for going through with them, he
might leave the task to him, the manager, who would engage to make short work
with it.
“That is not our bargain,” answered Wilhelm. “How can you, with all your
taste, show so much levity?”
“My friend,” cried Serlo, “you yourself will erelong feel it and show it. I
know too well how shocking such a mode of treating works is: perhaps it never
was allowed on any theatre till now. But where, indeed, was ever one so slighted
as ours? Authors force us on this wretched clipping system, and the public
tolerates it. How many pieces have we, pray, which do not overstep the measure
of our numbers, of our decorations and theatrical machinery, of the proper time,
of the fit alternation of dialogue, and the physical strength of the actor? And yet
we are to play, and play, and constantly give novelties. Ought we not to profit by
our privilege, then, since we accomplish just as much by mutilated works as by
entire ones? It is the public itself that grants the privilege. Few Germans, perhaps
few men of any modern nation, have a proper sense of an æsthetic whole: —
they praise and blame by passages; they are charmed by passages; and who has
greater reason to rejoice at this than actors, since the stage is ever but a patched
and piece-work matter?”
“Is!” cried Wilhelm; “but must it ever be so? Must every thing that is
continue? Convince me not that you are right, for no power on earth should force
me to abide by any contract which I had concluded with the grossest
misconceptions.”
Serlo gave a merry turn to the business, and persuaded Wilhelm to review
once more the many conversations they had had together about “Hamlet,” and
himself to invent some means of properly re-forming the piece.
After a few days, which he had spent alone, our friend returned with a
cheerful look. “I am much mistaken,” cried he, “if I have not now discovered
how the whole is to be managed: nay, I am convinced that Shakspeare himself
would have arranged it so, had not his mind been too exclusively directed to the
ruling interest, and perhaps misled by the novels which furnished him with his
materials.”
“Let us hear,” said Serlo, placing himself with an air of solemnity upon the
sofa: “I will listen calmly, but judge with rigor.”
“I am not afraid of you,” said Wilhelm: “only hear me. In the composition of
this play, after the most accurate investigation and the most mature reflection, I
distinguish two classes of objects. The first are the grand internal relations of the
persons and events, the powerful effects which arise from the characters and
proceedings of the main figures: these, I hold, are individually excellent; and the
order in which they are presented cannot be improved. No kind of interference
must be suffered to destroy them, or even essentially to change their form. These
are the things which stamp themselves deep into the soul, which all men long to
see, which no one dares to meddle with. Accordingly, I understand, they have
almost wholly been retained in all our German theatres. But our countrymen
have erred, in my opinion, with regard to the second class of objects, which may
be observed in this tragedy: I allude to the external relations of the persons,
whereby they are brought from place to place, or combined in various ways, by
certain accidental incidents. These they have looked upon as very unimportant;
have spoken of them only in passing, or left them out altogether. Now, indeed, it
must be owned, these threads are slack and slender; yet they run through the
entire piece, and bind together much that would otherwise fall asunder, and does
actually fall asunder, when you cut them off, and imagine you have done enough
and more, if you have left the ends hanging.
“Among these external relations I include the disturbances in Norway, the war
with young Fortinbras, the embassy to his uncle, the settling of that feud, the
march of young Fortinbras to Poland, and his coming back at the end; of the
same sort are Horatio’s return from Wittenberg, Hamlet’s wish to go thither, the
journey of Laertes to France, his return, the despatch of Hamlet into England, his
capture by pirates, the death of the two courtiers by the letter which they carried.
All these circumstances and events would be very fit for expanding and
lengthening a novel; but here they injure exceedingly the unity of the piece,
particularly as the hero has no plan, and are, in consequence, entirely out of
place.”
“For once in the right!” cried Serlo.
“Do not interrupt me,” answered Wilhelm: “perhaps you will not always think
me right. These errors are like temporary props of an edifice: they must not be
removed till we have built a firm wall in their stead. My project, therefore, is,
not at all to change those first-mentioned grand situations, or at least as much as
possible to spare them, both collectively and individually; but with respect to
these external, single, dissipated, and dissipating motives, to cast them all at
once away, and substitute a solitary one instead of them.”
“And this?” inquired Serlo, springing up from his recumbent posture.
“It lies in the piece itself,” answered Wilhelm, “only I employ it rightly. There
are disturbances in Norway. You shall hear my plan, and try it.”
“After the death of Hamlet the father, the Norwegians, lately conquered, grow
unruly. The viceroy of that country sends his son, Horatio, an old school-friend
of Hamlet’s, and distinguished above every other for his bravery and prudence,
to Denmark, to press forward the equipment of the fleet, which, under the new
luxurious king, proceeds but slowly. Horatio has known the former king, having
fought in his battles, having even stood in favor with him, — a circumstance by
which the first ghost-scene will be nothing injured. The new sovereign gives
Horatio audience, and sends Laertes into Norway with intelligence that the fleet
will soon arrive; whilst Horatio is commissioned to accelerate the preparation of
it: and the Queen, on the other hand, will not consent that Hamlet, as he wishes,
should go to sea along with him.”
“Heaven be praised!” cried Serlo: “we shall now get rid of Wittenberg and the
university, which was always a sorry piece of business. I think your idea
extremely good; for, except these two distant objects, Norway and the fleet, the
spectator will not be required to fancy any thing: the rest he will see; the rest
takes place before him; whereas, his imagination, on the other plan, was hunted
over all the world.”
“You easily perceive,” said Wilhelm, “how I shall contrive to keep the other
parts together. When Hamlet tells Horatio of his uncle’s crime, Horatio counsels
him to go to Norway in his company, to secure the affections of the army, and
return in warlike force. Hamlet also is becoming dangerous to the King and
Queen; they find no readier method of deliverance, than to send him in the fleet,
with Rosencrantz and Guildenstern to be spies upon him; and, as Laertes in the
mean time comes from France, they determine that this youth, exasperated even
to murder, shall go after him. Unfavorable winds detain the fleet: Hamlet
returns; for his wandering through the churchyard, perhaps some lucky motive
may be thought of; his meeting with Laertes in Ophelia’s grave is a grand
moment, which we must not part with. After this, the King resolves that it is
better to get quit of Hamlet on the spot: the festival of his departure, the
pretended reconcilement with Laertes, are now solemnized; on which occasion
knightly sports are held, and Laertes fights with Hamlet. Without the four
corpses, I cannot end the play: no one must survive. The right of popular election
now again comes in force; and Hamlet, while dying, gives his vote to Horatio.”
“Quick! quick!” said Serlo, “sit down and work the play: your plan has my
entire approbation; only let not your zeal evaporate.”
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: |