Conduct of modern science– 2016 • Díl 1

16 Гелман В. Выход из неопределенности и переспективы демократизации // Pro et Contra.1998.T.3.№3 С 57
29

---

Science without borders - 2020 ★ Volume 14
Sarvar Otamurodov was excited about the unexpected question and, in fact, 
showed my candidacy as the leader of the party, but I'm not ready yet, as it turned out...
The majority of candidates who can be promoted by political parties 
(https://kun.uz/26762941) (all) as long as there are officials who are members of the 
government, that is, the Parliament should be able to control tomorrow, from time to 
time. Supposedly coalition of government in Uzbekistan, depending on the place where 
the parties won the elections, occupies a portfolio of ministers in the government.
Why does not a party see its leader as the Prime Minister? Can not the leader 
of the party who participated in the presidential election manage the government? The 
logic is resting, so.
There was an interesting trend in Uzbekistan: the more compromises in 
political struggle, the more people pay little attention to them. This is due to the 
following three cases. 
First,
people get tired of compromise. In recent years, a lot of 
negative information about almost all subjects operating on the political scene has 
widespread. 
Secondly,
some people think that it is a house full of politics cheats. 
Therefore, the compromise does not leave a strong impression on such people. 
Thirdly,
some people do not accept the information provided to the public as a compromise as 
a public disclosure. They do not focus on the personal life of the politician. If the 
acceptance of compromise by the public is not at a high level, why is the interest in the 
tactics of throwing a compromise high? The main reason for the use of compromise is 
to harm the opponent himself. He begins to irritate, to justify himself. As a result, 
carefully thought-out steps are taken.
Political parties influence the exchange of political elite depending on the 
political systems of different types. In particular, the totalitarian political systems are 
defined by the general ideology of society, the totalitarian politicization, the excessive 
centralization of the management apparatus, the penetration of its social organism into 
all parties. In such systems, the political party becomes an institution of the totalitarian 
type, which depends on power. They work in cooperation with the authorities, do not 
give freedom to the activities of opposition movements in society. In such a system, 
the elite is distinguished from the same single-party structure, the entrance to the party 
structure is equal to the transformation into an elite. The head of power is considered 
the very first leader of this party. The remaining elite positions are won by prominent 
personalities in the party. All organizations in the society and the state count with the 
party. An individual is faced with full incorporation upon exclusion (liquidation) from
30

---