-316
-
Many Jewish political writers strongly favored the term Stalinism — a convenient form
to justify the earlier Soviet régime. It is difficult to part with the old familiar and sweet things, if
it is really possible at all.
There have been attempts to increase the influence of intellectuals on the ruling élite.
Such was the
Letter to the XXIII Congress (of the Communist Party) by G. Pomerants (1966).
The letter asked the Communist Party to trust the “scientific and creative intelligentsia,” that
“desires not anarchy but the rule of law … that wants not to destroy the existing system but to
make it more flexible, more rational, more humane” and proposed to establish an advisory think
tank, which would
generally consult the executive leadership of the country. The offer remained
unanswered.
And many souls long ached for such a wasted opportunity with such a glorious past.
But there was no longer any choice . And so the Soviet Jews split away from
communism. And now, while deserting it, they turned against it. And that was such a perfect
opportunity — they could themselves, with expurgatory repentance, acknowledge their formerly
active and cruel role in the triumph of communism in Russia.
Yet almost none of them did (I discuss the few exceptions below.) The above-mentioned
collection of essays,
Russia and the Jews, so heartfelt, so much needed and so timely when
published in 1924 was fiercely denounced by Jewry. And even today, according to the opinion of
the erudite scholar, Shimon Markish: “these days, nobody dares to defend those hook-nosed and
burry commissars because of fear of being branded pro-Soviet, a Chekist, a God-knows-what
else…. Yet let me say in no uncertain terms: the behavior of those Jewish youths who joined the
Reds is a thousand times more understandable than the reasons of the authors of that collection
of works.”
Still, some Jewish authors began to recognize certain things of the past as they really
were, though in the most cautious terms: “It was the end of the role of the Russian-Jewish
intelligentsia that developed in the prewar and early postwar years and that was — to some
degree sincerely — a bearer of Marxist ideology and that professed, however timidly and
implicitly and contrary to actual practice, the ideals of liberalism, internationalism and
humanism.” A bearer of Marxist ideology? Yes, of course. The ideals of internationalism? Sure.
Yet liberalism and humanism? True, but only after Stalin’s death, while coming to senses.
However, very different things can be inferred from the writings of the majority of
Jewish publicists in the late Soviet Union. Looking back to the very year of 1917, they find that
under communism there was nothing but Jewish suffering! “Among the many nationalities of the
Soviet Union, the Jews have
always been stigmatized as the least reliable element.”
What an incredibly short memory one should have to state such things in 1983.
Always?
What about the 1920s? And the 1930s? To assert that they were
then considered the
least
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: