106
Agenda For Peace: Preventive Diplomacy, Peacemaking And Peacekeeping' which was geared
towards creating possibilities for successfully meeting threats to common security Ghali, in his
Agenda for Peace, gave his analysis and recommendations on ways of strengthening and making
more efficient, within the framework and provisions of the Charter, the capacity of the UN for
preventive diplomacy, peacemaking and peacekeeping-to which he had added the closely related
concept of peace building. In addition and stressing the need for preventive diplomacy, the SO
observed;
among other things, the need for 'confidence building measures' that is hinged on
information-gathering and fact-finding (Early Warning) which could involve preventive
deployment among other things.
Also, In July 1997, Kofi Annan proposed reforms that are
aimed at confronting the
challenges of the coming decades and also, emphasizing that any reform is an evolving process.
This reform is aimed at avoiding any failure in the R2P civilians in a timely manner (as experienced
in Bosnia and Rwanda) and also to ensure that there is adequate self-defense mechanisms for
peacekeeping forces and UN staff members (Learning from the situations in Sierra Leon and East
Timor, where. UN Staff were kidnapped and murdered by Mobs and Militias). Mr.
Annan
repeatedly emphasized the need for peacekeeping forces to develop new capabilities for
peacekeeping mandates among population in conflict zones while arguing that peacekeeping
forces are now in need of greater coercive capacity. However, he
cautioned that reliance on
coercion alone is insufficient.
Moreover, while we are in agreement that till this date, all of the above mentioned steps
(and many more) geared towards making peacekeeping better, are still evolving and will continue
to take shape as the years roll by, we will add that it has also been suggested that the Security
Council be enlarged and that the veto power of the permanent members be amended. For us, that
is a welcome development.
Therefore, we are unanimously in support of the fact that the UN, no doubt, is still very
much relevant and needed today. But if the UN wants to use that relevance to live up to its charter
and save the coming generations from the heart-ache of conflicts and/or wars, she needs to be
armed in its peacekeeping agenda. The UN, obviously, needs
the funding, the strength and the
capacity to mount and support a new generation of peacekeeping operations because, in our
opinion, based on the position
of various reform suggestions, the nature of today's wars has
107
changed and peacekeeping MUST 'dress up' for her call.
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: