Zahiriddin muhammad bobur nomidagi andijon davlat universiteti ingliz tili grammatikasi kafedrasi

Below are combinability patterns of numeral grammemes arranged in tabular form.
Cardinal & Ordinal
Pattern grammeme grammeme (per cent) (per cent) art. -f num. -f - noun 80 98 noun -4 - prepos. + num. 8 link-verb + num. 8 1 other models {page ten, one 4 1 of them, etc.)
English and Russian numerals are similar as to their lexico-grammatical meanings, ways of stem-building, combinability and syntactical functions, but they differ greatly as regards their grammatical categories.
1) Unlike their English counterparts, Russian numerals possess the categories of gender {пятый — пятая — пятое) case (четыре — четырех — четырем, etc.) and number (пер­
вый — первые).
2) There is a great difference between ordinal and-cardinal numerals in Russian as far as their categories are concerned. Ordinal numerals resemble adjectives not only in having the categories of number, gender and case, but in the forms of the grammatical morphemes as well.
Cf . пятый — красный пятого — красного пятому — пятая — красная пятые — красные красному
Cardinal numerals do not possess the categories of number and gender (with the exception of один, два). The case inflections are also different.
Cf . десять — десяти — десятью
знать — знати — знатью
It is no wonder, therefore, that some linguists separate cardinal and ordinal numerals in Russian and regard the latter as adjectives. But this is certainly no reason why the same should be done in English where conditions are quite different.
In certain cases we see special uses of the numerals in combination with the indefinite article in expressing performance assessments: a two, a three, a four, a five, etc. For example: I am giving you a five for your answer (Мен сизнинг жавобингиз учун беш(бахо) қўйяпман-Я ставлю вам пять за ответ). or I have got a four for my composition (Мен иншодан турт (баҳо) олдим. Or Мен иншо учун турт (баҳо) олдим).
As we see the compared languages have certain isomorphic and allomorphic features in their numerals both structurally and semantically, their isomorphic features indicating the universal – general laws of development of this or that system of the compared languages as means or tools of communication, whereas their allomorphic features show that compared languages are characterized by idiomatism closely linked with the original thinking of the native speakers of this or that national language.