Тошкент давлат педагогика университети ҳузуридаги фан доктори илмий даражасини берувчи 16

Total 
201 
100 
203 
100 
206 
100 
228 
100 
Apparently from table 1, at the beginning of the experiments low indicators, 
and at the end – high rates had the level of knowledge of students (Figure 2). 

---

69 
Control group
Experimental group
0
10
20
30
40
50
At the
beginning
experiment
At the
finishing
experiment
High
average
Iow
43.8
17.4
38.8
45.3
18.2
36.5
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
At the
beginning
experiment 
At the
finishing
experiment 
High
average
low
57
21
22
43.7
18.5
37.8
Figure 2. Charts of level of development 
For definition of reliability of the obtained data, used Pearson and Student's 
criteria. 
The quantitative data table 1 received as a result of an experiment were 
exposed mathematical-statistically to the analysis. For this purpose, have 
conditionally designated the level of development of students of the control Xi 
group, and experimental group - Ui. Indicators of level of development by students 
of control and experimental groups have estimated by estimates "high", "average" 
and "low" having replaced conditionally, in figures "5", "4" and "3", and numbers 
on groups have designated pi and mi. As a result, from data of table 3, have formed 
2 following tables: