126 |
In these types of sentences,
lanzar
means roughly ‘to begin an action’. DELE defines
the verb as ‘to begin an action with spirit or without reflection’. VOX defines it as ‘to
undertake an action abruptly or with decisiveness’. Ignoring for now the manner in which the
action
is undertaken, this is an example of an inchoative phrase. The verb no longer means
physical
motion per se, but the beginning or initiation of an action. I will term this the
nominal inchoative
27
.
Most
of the time, the noun is introduced by the preposition
a
‘at/to’ see (193) and
(194). But there are also three cases where the preposition used is
en
‘in/on’ as in (195). All
the examples also include a
se-
form clitic. We can propose a nominal inchoative schema for
lanzar
that captures these characteristics.
Figure 19
. Nominal Inchoative schema for
lanzar
.
I still argue that the clitic is a reflexive clitic. Recall that a truly reflexive clitic is part
of the verbal paradigm and is replaceable by non-co-referential clitics. We can distinguish
se
-
form clitics which are always co-referential with the subject
and cannot be changed to
another clitic without drastically changing the meaning or resulting in ungrammaticality (see
§4.2.1) from reflexive clitics that are usually co-referential but can be changed in some cases.
It is true that in the vast majority of nominal inchoative sentences, the clitic is co-referential
with the subject. Still, there are cases where the clitic is replaceable
by non-co-referential
clitics. The following is an example taken from the contemporary corpus available by the
Real Academia Española called CREA.
(CREA, La Vanguardia 1995)
(196) Sirviéndose
de un altavoz los
LANZÓ
al ataque
…
Helping.oneself of a loudspeaker CL.3
rd
.pl.nonrf launch.3
rd
.sg to.the attack
‘Using a loudspeaker s/he sent them into attack.’
Sentence (196) shows a clitic that is not co-referential with the subject; the
INITIATOR
is making someone else begin the attack. This supports the analysis that the clitic in this
schema is a reflexive clitic, because it can be replaced by other clitics. Still, I have written
se
in the schema to capture the fact that the majority of the time the clitic is co-referential. The
27
Infinitival verbs appear in similar syntactic contexts as nouns. Infinitival verbs
can be the subject of a
sentence, they can be modified by adjectives, and appear as the predicate of a copula.
For these reasons,
DIRECTIONALS
with infinitival verbs can be considered nominals. The choice of terminology is just meant as a
label to distinguish the
DIRECTIONALS
with nouns from those with verbs.
I
NITIATOR
lanzar
se
[
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: