(2015); Olson and Land (2008); Olson et
al. (2016).
75 Kim et al. (2011); Olson and Land (2008);
Olson et al. (2016).
76 Gallagher, Woodworth, and Arshan
(2015).
77 Ruth and Murphy (1988).
78 Smith and Swain (2011).
79 Mueller (2014).
80 Kentucky Department of Education (2012).
81 Ibid.
82 C.B. Olson. (2015).
83 National Writing Project (2016).
84 Adapted from “Thinking of Teaching” blog
(http://thinkingofteaching.blogspot.ca/).
85 Lewin and Shoemaker (2011).
86 Graham (in press).
87 Duke (2000).
88 The gradual release of responsibility model
was coined by Pearson and Gallagher (1983).
89 Following WWC guidelines, improved out-
comes are indicated by either a positive
statistically significant effect or a positive,
substantively important effect size. The WWC
defines substantively important, or large,
effects on outcomes to be those with effect
sizes greater than or equal to 0.25 standard
deviations. See the WWC guidelines at http://
whatworks.ed.gov.
90 For more information, see the WWC Fre-
quently Asked Questions page for practice
guides at http://whatworks.ed.gov.
91 This includes randomized control trials (RCTs)
and quasi-experimental design studies (QEDs).
Studies not contributing to levels of evidence
include single-case designs (SCDs) evaluated
with WWC pilot SCD standards and regression
discontinuity designs (RDDs) evaluated with
pilot RDD standards.
92 The research may include studies generally
meeting WWC group design standards and
supporting the effectiveness of a program,
practice, or approach with small sample sizes
and/or other conditions of implementation
or analysis that limit generalizability. The
research may include studies that support the
generality of a relation but do not meet WWC
group design standards; however, they have
no major flaws related to internal validity
other than lack of demonstrated equivalence
at pretest for QEDs. QEDs without equivalence
must include a pretest covariate as a statisti-
cal control for selection bias. These studies
must be accompanied by at least one relevant
study meeting WWC design standards. For
this practice guide, the latter studies did not
need to be considered because a sufficient
number of studies meet WWC design stan-
dards for each recommendation.
93 American Educational Research Association,
American Psychological Association, and
National Council on Measurement in Educa-
tion (1999).
94 Fitzgerald and Markham (1987).
95 Murphy and Smith (2015).
96 Olson, Scarcella, and Matuchniak (2015).
97 Eligible studies that meet WWC group design
standards with or without reservations are
indicated by bold text in the endnotes and
references pages.
98 A statistically significant finding is a finding
that is unlikely to occur by chance.
99 Substantively important findings are defined
as those with an effect size greater than or
equal to 0.25 or less than or equal to –0.25,
as measured by Hedge’s g.
(
87
)
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: |