SCIENCE AND PRACTICE: IMPLEMENTATION TO MODERN SOCIETY
455
process - their complaints most often relate to the fact that many teachers are not able
to effectively convey knowledge and skills, which is quite often formulated as if the
teachers were not able to “teach me / us anything ”, expecting that the teacher in the
learning process puts knowledge and skills into them, so to speak, without the students'
independent labor, without their efforts.
Thus, speaking about the process of teaching any subject at school or university
(for example, a foreign language), it is necessary to take into account both motivation
and stimulation, and the factors that influence both of these processes. If any of these
parts turns out to be weak or missing, it will be either impossible to achieve the desired
result in practice, or it will not correspond to what was originally intended.
Motivation - at least in the scientific community - most often mistakenly refers to some
aspect of stimulation; we often read about the “transfer of motivation by the teacher to
the students,” that “the teacher must motivate,” be the “motivator,” that motivating is
the responsibility of the teacher or teacher. However, it is forgotten that a teacher (as
an external factor) can only stimulate a student, but not motivate, because the path from
stimulation
to motivation, to stimulating students' internal motives is not direct and
short, because motivation is an internal personal process.
Let's pay attention to the motivation for teaching students of higher educational
institutions. What are the motives that bring them to universities? Is it a diploma as a
confirmation (for the rest of your life) of your ability to pass all the necessary exams?
Is it the sum of theoretical knowledge and the ability to subsequently transform it into
practical skills in professional activity? Is this a kind of status (or privilege) associated
with a university degree? Is this a chance to make more money after graduation? You
can find many other motives forcing students to go to college and study there. On the
other hand, the teacher's task is to show the importance of both the subject and specific
knowledge and to transfer this knowledge and specific skills to students, i.e. from his
point of view, the goal / motive is neither a diploma, nor money, nor anything else.
We have come to the crucial question of our reasoning: which side is more
responsible for the results of the learning process - the teacher or the student? This is
SCIENTIFIC COLLECTION «INTERCONF» | № 3(39)
456
not
an easy question, and the answer does not lie on the surface. According to our
convictions, it is necessary to distinguish:
1. The area of responsibility of the teacher, who must work according to the
educational plan, perform the
tasks of preparing lectures, seminars so that students
come to a certain system of knowledge, have specific knowledge (concepts, patterns)
and skills, offer this to students, indicating that is mandatory (both for exams and for
practice), and what is optional; he, of course, is primarily responsible for the fulfillment
of the objectives of the curriculum, for the development of the knowledge and skills
defined in it.
2. The area of responsibility of the student who, having chosen this specialty, is
obliged to perceive the obligatory part of the information contained in the educational
plan of the program, prepare for exams and,
following his motivation, choose other
(additional) impulses of the teacher's influence on the student, hidden in the educational
process ... Students have the opportunity to ask the instructor for additional information
on issues of particular interest - in this way they can meet their specific interests,
thereby helping the instructor to connect the requirements of the program with their
personal motives.
Consider the mistakes made by teachers in the process of motivating
students.
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: