Class openers for students taking both the FCAT and Algebra End of Course Test
PLCs
Data-Chats
3.7.
Assistant Principals, Math coach, Department Head
|
3.7.
CWT's,
Peer Observations, PLC’s
recorded minutes
|
3.7.
End of Course Exam
|
Based on the analysis of student achievement data, and reference to “Guiding Questions”, identify and define areas in need of improvement for the following group:
|
Anticipated Barrier
|
Strategy
|
Person or Position Responsible for Monitoring
|
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of
Strategy
|
Evaluation Tool
|
4. Percentage of students in Lowest 25% making learning gains in mathematics
Mathematics Goal #4:
|
4.1.
Inconsistent use of Differentiated Instructional
Strategies
|
4.1.
Increase use of technology during instruction
Vocabulary acquisition through student-created word walls
Demonstrate the effective use of cooperative grouping
Intensify the use of reading strategies in the content area
PLCs
Data-Chats
|
4.1.
Assistant Principal, Math coach, Department Head
|
4.1.
CWT's,
Observations, PLC’s
recorded minutes
|
4.1.
Mini BATS,
BAT, Algebra and Geometry EOC Tests.
|
The students will show proficiency equal to the Lowest 25% students in the district.
|
2011 Current Level of Performance:*
|
2012 Expected Level of Performance:*
|
Enter numerical data for current level of performance in this box.
|
Enter numerical data for expected level of performance in this box.
|
|
4.2.
Inadequate use of data and its interpretation
|
4.2.
Collaboration during Professional Learning Community meetings
Increase the number of data chats with students
Use data results to steer curriculum and instruction
PLCs
Data-Chats
|
4.2.
Assistant Principal, Math coach, Department Head
|
4.2.
CWT's,
Observations, PLC’s
recorded minutes
|
4.2.
Mini BATS,
BAT, Algebra and Geometry EOC Test.
|
4.3.
Inability to create measurable learning objectives
|
4.3.
Peer observation- Shared Best Practices
Profession Development on effectively writing measurable learning objectives
Collaboration during Professional Learning Communities
PLCs
Data-Chats
|
4.3.
Assistant Principal, Math coach, Department Head
|
4.3.
CWT's,
Observations, PLC’s
recorded minutes
|
4.3.
Lesson Plans
|
4.4.
Inconsistent use of rigorous higher order questioning strategies
|
4.4.
Differentiating instruction by implementing the resources that accompany the new adoption series
Common planning
Professional Learning Communities
PLCs
Data-Chats
|
4.4.
Assistant Principal, Math coach, Department Head, Model Teachers
|
4.4.
CWT's,
Observations, PLC’s
recorded minutes
|
4.4.
Mini BATS,
BAT, Algebra and Geometry EOC Test.
|
4.5.
Unfamiliarity with the newly adopted textbooks and the New Generation Sunshine State Standards
|
4.5.
District curriculum Summer Training
In-house Professional Development facilitated by teachers who attended the Summer Training
PLCs
Data-Chats
|
4.5.
Math coach
|
4.5.
CWT's
Observations, PLC’s
recorded minutes
|
4.5.
Lesson Plans
|
4.6.
Unfamiliarity with the platform of the new End of Course Algebra test
|
4.6.
District support
Extended Learning Opportunities for students taking
Algebra and Geometry EOC test
Class openers for students taking both the Algebra and Geometry End of Course Tests
PLCs
Data-Chats
|
4.6.
Assistant Principals, Math coach, Department Head
|
4.6.
CWT's,
Observations, PLC’s
recorded minutes
|
4.6.
End of Course Exam
|
Based on the analysis of student achievement data, and reference to “Guiding Questions”, identify and define areas in need of improvement for the applicable subgroup(s):
|
Anticipated Barrier
|
Strategy
|
Person or Position Responsible for Monitoring
|
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of
Strategy
|
Evaluation Tool
|
5A. Student subgroups not making Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) in mathematics
Mathematics Goal #5A:
|
Mathematics Goal #5A:
Ethnicity
(White, Black, Hispanic, Asian,
American Indian)
|
5A.1.
Inadequate use of data and its interpretation
|
5A.1.
Collaboration during Professional Learning Community meetings
Increase the number of data chats with students
Use data results to steer curriculum and instruction.
PLCs
Data-Chats
|
5A.1.
Assistant Principal, Math coach, Department Head
|
5A.1. CWT's,
Observations, PLC’s
recorded minutes
|
5A.1.
Mini BATS, BAT, Algebra and Geometry EOC Tests.
|
Same level of proficiency as the district level NGSSS.
|
2011 Current Level of Performance:*
|
2012 Expected Level of Performance:*
|
Enter numerical data for current level of performance in this box.
White:
Black:
Hispanic:
Asian:
American Indian:
|
Enter numerical data for expected level of performance in this box.
White:
Black:
Hispanic:
Asian:
American Indian:
|
|
5A.2..
Inconsistent use of rigorous higher order questioning strategies
|
5A.2.
Adhere to the guidelines of Webb’s Levels of Complexity when creating assessments as well as those of Bloom’s Taxonomy when instructing students
Common planning
Professional Learning Communities
Data Chats
|
5A.2.
Assistant Principal, Math coach, Department Head, Model Teachers
|
5A.2.
CWT's,
Observations, PLC’s
recorded minutes
|
5A.2.
Mini BATS, BAT, Algebra and Geometry EOC Tests.
|
5A.3.
Inability to create measurable learning objectives
|
5A.3.
Incorporate the Process Standards as set out with the Next Generation Sunshine State Standards (NGSSS)
Collaboration during Professional Learning communities
Data Chats
|
5A.3.
Assistant Principal, Math coach, Department Head
|
5A.3.
CWT's,
Observations, PLC’s
recorded minutes
|
5A.3.
Lesson Plans
|
5A.4.
Unfamiliarity with the newly adopted textbooks and the New Generation Sunshine State Standards
|
5A.4.
District curriculum Summer Training
In-house Professional Development facilitated by the teachers who attended the Summer Training
Assistance from the District Support Trainers
PLCs
Data-Chats
|
5A.4.
Math Coach
|
5A.4.
CWT's,
Observations, PLC’s
recorded minutes
|
5A.4.
Lesson Plans
|
5A.5.
Unfamiliarity with the platform of the new End of Course Algebra test
|
5A.5.
District support
Extended Learning Opportunities for students taking
Algebra tests
Class openers for students taking Algebra End of Course Tests
PLCs
Data-Chats
|
5A.5.
Assistant Principal, Math coach, Department Head
|
5A.5.
Observations
CWT's,
Observations, PLC’s
recorded minutes
|
5A.5.
End of Course Exams
|
Based on the analysis of student achievement data, and reference to “Guiding Questions”, identify and define areas in need of improvement for the following subgroup:
|
Anticipated Barrier
|
Strategy
|
Person or Position Responsible for Monitoring
|
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of
Strategy
|
Evaluation Tool
|
5B. Student subgroups not making Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) in mathematics
Mathematics Goal #5B:
|
Mathematics Goal #5B:
English Language Learners (ELL)
|
5B.1.
Inconsistent use of Differentiated Instructional
Strategies
|
5B.1.
Increase use of technology during instruction
Implementation of CRISS strategies for mathematics
Demonstrate the effective use of cooperative grouping
PLCs
Data-Chats
|
5B.1.
Assistant Principal, Math coach, Department Head, ESOL Guidance
|
5B.1.
CWT's,
Observations, PLC’s
recorded minutes
|
5B.1.
Mini BATS,
BAT, Algebra and Geometry End of Course tests.
|
The students will show proficiency equal to the subgroup ELL percentages to students in the district.
|
2010 Current Level of Performance:*
|
2011 Expected Level of Performance:*
|
Enter numerical data for current level of performance in this box.
|
Enter numerical data for expected level of performance in this box.
|
|
5B.2.
Inconsistent use of ESOL/Literacy strategies to scaffold instruction
|
5B.2.
Vocabulary acquisition through student-created word walls
Problem Solving strategies posted and frequently used
In-service teachers on updated ESOL strategies and how to effectively implement
PLCs
Data-Chats
|
5B.2.
Assistant Principal, Math coach, Department Head, ESOL Guidance
|
5B.2.
CWT's,
Observations, PLC’s
recorded minutes
|
5B.2.
Mini BATS,
BAT, Algebra and Geometry End of Course tests.
|
|
5B.3
Inconsistent use of rigorous higher order questioning strategies
|
5B.3.
Use ESOL strategies to assist in scaffolding and building students’ confidence
Integrate technology to assist students in making personal connections to help with high order thinking
Professional Learning Communities
Data Chats
|
5B.3.
Assistant Principal, Math coach, Department Head, ESOL
|
5B.3.
CWT's,
Observations, PLC’s
recorded minutes
|
5B.3.
Mini BATS,
BAT, Algebra I and Geometry End of Course tests.
|
5B.4.
Teachers and Staff need to be better able to identify ELL students and their classification level.
|
5B.4.
ELL Training sessions offered by the District
ELL training sessions as part of school collegiality
ELL identification training through PLCs
ESOL Endorsement for all teachers
Data Chats
|
5B.4.
ESOL Coordinator
ESOL Support Staff
|
5B.4.
ESOL Support Staff Review, ESOL Coordinator assessment, ESOL PLCs, ESOL Department Meetings with a focus in Mathematics.
|
5B.4.
Lesson Plans with ESOL Strategies identified
|
Based on the analysis of student achievement data, and reference to “Guiding Questions”, identify and define areas in need of improvement for the following subgroup:
|
Anticipated Barrier
|
Strategy
|
Person or Position Responsible for Monitoring
|
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of
Strategy
|
Evaluation Tool
|
5C. Student subgroups not making Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) in mathematics
Mathematics Goal #5C:
|
Mathematics Goal #5C:
Students with Disabilities (SWD)
|
5C.1.
NA
|
5C.1.
NA
|
5C.1.
NA
|
5C.1.
NA
|
5C.1.
NA
|
NA
|
2011Current Level of Performance:*
|
2012 Expected Level of Performance:*
|
Enter numerical data for current level of performance in this box.
|
Enter numerical data for expected level of performance in this box.
|
|
5C.2.
|
5C.2.
|
5C.2.
|
5C.2.
|
5C.2.
|
5C.3.
|
5C.3.
|
5C.3.
|
5C.3.
|
5C.3.
|
Based on the analysis of student achievement data, and reference to “Guiding Questions”, identify and define areas in need of improvement for the following subgroup:
|
Anticipated Barrier
|
Strategy
|
Person or Position Responsible for Monitoring
|
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of
Strategy
|
Evaluation Tool
|
5D. Student subgroups not making Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) in mathematics
Mathematics Goal #5D:
|
Mathematics Goal #5D:
Economically Disadvantaged
|
5D.1.
Unfamiliarity with the platform of the new End of Course Algebra test
|
5D.1.
District support
Extended Learning Opportunities for students taking
Algebra and Geometry End of Course tests.
Class openers for students taking both Algebra and Geometry End of Course Tests
PLCs
Data-Chats
|
5D.1.
Assistant Principal, Math coach, Department Head
|
5D.1.
CWT's,
Observations, PLC’s
recorded minutes
|
5D.1.
Lesson Plans
|
The students will show proficiency equal to the Economically disadvantaged students in the district.
|
2010 Current Level of Performance:*
|
2011 Expected Level of Performance:*
|
Enter numerical data for current level of performance in this box.
|
Enter numerical data for expected level of performance in this box.
|
|
5D.2.
Lack of adequate foundational skills of mathematics concepts
|
5D.2.
Scaffolding instruction with an emphasis on prerequisite skills and problem solving strategies
Provide extended learning opportunities before and after school
|
5D.2.
Assistant Principal, Math coach, Department Head
|
5D.2.
CWT's,
Observations, PLC’s
recorded minutes
|
5D.2.
Mini BATS,
BAT, Algebra and Geometry End of Course tests.
|
5D.3.
Insufficient availability to access computer based learning
|
5D.3.
Increase computer use during lesson execution
Provide opportunities for students who are excelling to access extended course activities
PLCs
Data-Chats
|
5D.3.
Assistant Principal, Math coach, Department Head
|
5D.3.
CWT's,
Observations, PLC’s
recorded minutes
|
5D.3.
Mini BATS,
BAT, Algebra and Geometry End of Course tests.
|