Masharipov jahongir axmedovich conceptual analysis of the components of metaphor with the elements of mentality in english and uzbek

qoni qaynab
ketdi[39;83] 
My grandfather’s blood boiled (word for word) 
ANGER IS A SUBSTANCE WHICH CAN ACT 
Jahlim 
chiqdi.
– My anger went out – word-for-word
ANGER IS SMOULDERING SUBSTANCE 
Amaki 
tutab tetdi
 – The man 
smouldered with rage
 
The major correspondences, or mappings, of the metaphor include:
(i) the container with the substance => the angry person's body in it
(2) the substance (fluid, gas, objects) => the anger in the pressurized 
container
(3) the physical pressure in the => the potentially dangerous container social 
or psychophysiological force of the anger
(4) the cause of the pressure => the cause of the dangerous force

---

60 
(5) the control of the physical => the control of the social or pressure 
psycho-physiological force
(6) the inability to control the => the inability to control the physical 
pressure dangerous social or psychophysiological force [21;170] 
The author further commenting on says that the main reason for such kind of 
universality is that the similar physiological conditions of those nations. Author 
claims, when you are angry, your blood pressure is high, or pulse rate increases, 
you get a headache and other conditions which all of them undergo when they are 
testy. It makes sense. But we cannot say that this is the only case which likeness 
happens, Kovecses claims there are other factors too, including perceptual, 
cultural, category-based and others. They can also affect to this phenomenon. And 
the main key factor is mentality, as only it with the help of cognition and 
perception of course, decides the final resolution. Mostly Kovecses claims there 
are discprepencies in cultures, and as result it happens such differences or 
similarities, but we argue that it is rather mentality not culture. Since mentality is 
pertained to cognition (which is done first), culture is related to action (it means 
then it is passed to it).