3 disability and
inClusion
The history of disability is for the most part one of
exclusion, discrimination and stigmatization. Often
segregated from society, persons with disabilities –
and in particular, children with disabilities – have been
regarded as objects of charity and passive recipients
of welfare. This charity-based legacy persists in many
countries and affects the perception and treatment
received by children with disabilities.
the ’social model’ of disability
The human rights approach to disability has led to a
shift in focus from
a child’s
limitations
arising from
impairments, to the
barriers within society
that
prevent the child from having access to basic social
services, developing to the fullest potential and from
enjoying her or his rights. This is the essence of the
social model of disability.
The emphasis given to equality and non-discrimi-
nation in international human rights instruments is
reflected in the social model of disability. This model
rejects the long-established idea that obstacles to the
participation of disabled people arise primarily from
their impairment and focuses instead on environmen-
tal barriers. These include:
prevailing attitudes and preconceptions, leading
•
to underestimation;
the policies, practices and procedures of local
•
and national government;
the structure of health, welfare and education
•
systems;
lack of access to buildings, transport and to the
•
whole range of community resources available to
the rest of the population;
the impact of poverty and deprivation on the
•
community as a whole and more specifically on
persons with disabilities and their families.
A great deal can be done to remove or reduce the
barriers faced by children and adults with disabilities.
For persons with disabilities, this is both a liberating
and an empowering view, one that emphasizes the
positive contribution that they themselves can make
in removing the barriers to their participation. At the
same time, the social model emphasizes the role of
government and civil society in removing the obsta-
cles faced by citizens with disabilities in becoming ac-
tive participants in the various communities in which
they live, learn and work.
Emphasizing the social construction of disability in
no way implies rejecting medical and professional
services and supports. Nor does it mean denying the
potential of intervention in reducing or alleviating an
impairment or in providing rehabilitation or training.
Provision of technical aids, medical intervention and
professional support are all important ways of pro-
moting empowerment and independence and are an
integral part of the social model. For example, a sim-
ple medical procedure may be all that is required to
help a child with eye or ear infections to benefit from
classroom learning.
Nevertheless, the medical model (sometimes known
as the ’defect model’) still exerts a disproportion-
ate influence at many levels. For example, teachers
and parents sometimes ask questions such as “Can
children with Down’s Syndrome attend an ordinary
school?” or “How do you teach children with muscu-
lar dystrophy?” The answer to the last question was
given by a group of 48 children with muscular dystro-
phy from France:
Care providers cannot understand that we are all
different, even if we have the same condition, the
same disability. What we want to say to all adults
who take care of us is that we are 48 different
personalities. There is no personality type known
as muscular dystrophy.
7
This quotation emphasizes that the rights, needs and
voice of the individual child are fundamental. It is this
principle that lies at the heart of the Convention on
the Rights of the Child and is reflected as well in the
Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: |