host country. Thus, developing countries need currency to
purchase foreign
investment goods and services. In this case, the policy of developing the national
economy through import substitution may have the major impact.
Studies conducted in many countries (for example, Meier, 1989) describe
advantages of boosting domestic production through
export substitution (export
of more processed forms of a good instead of only exporting the raw material)
over
import substitution (replacement of some agricultural or industrial imports
to encourage local production for local consumption, with simultaneous
introduction of protectionist measures).
These advantages can be summarized as follows:
- import substitution saves foreign currency, while export substitution
generates
more currency
- the domestic market of any product is smaller than the world market,
which gives economies of scale, opportunities for advanced training and fair
competition
- export substitution is a more effective strategy than the protectionist
import substitution policy
- internal resources are used more effectively (no incentives to over-
consume resources)
- the burden of external debt is eased, external debt service improves, and
there are more opportunities
for external borrowing
In addition, import substitution tends to engage the country in creating low-
attractive sectors or industries where it has little chances to gain a competitive
advantage. Though protectionism may guarantee that these industries have
access to domestic markets, domestic producers will not be able to rise to levels
of international competitiveness. Some industries will be vulnerable to economic
cycles and currency fluctuations. Some countries have already overcome the era
of closed internal markets (e.g., the Soviet Union). As a result, when countries
started trading outside their own national borders, imported goods
of higher
quality appeared on the domestic market. In such a situation, there are only two
ways: either to close national borders, which will lead to economic (and hence
political) isolation from the outside world with all its negative consequences, or
to attempt to create an open consumer-oriented economy.
Now let us define the terms ‘foreign investment’ and ‘foreign investors’
using the case of Russia.
Foreign investment is understood as all types of
tangible and intangible values invested by foreign investors in the domestic
economy in objects of entrepreneurial and other activities because of higher
expected rates of return. In Russia, foreign investment
can take the form of
investment in: (1) newly created and modernized fixed assets and working
capital in any industry and sector of the economy (2) securities (3) specific
money deposits (4) technological solutions (5) intellectual property (6)
ownership rights. The legal regime for foreign investment and foreign investor
36
activities must be just as favorable as the business regime for Russian legal
entities and individuals. Foreign investment is not subject to nationalization,
requisition, or confiscation, but for exceptional instances set forth by Russian
legislation when such measures are taken for the public benefit. In cases of
nationalization or requisition, foreign investors are paid out an adequate and
sufficient compensation which should correspond to the real cost of nationalized
or requisitioned investment.
The following
categories can be foreign investors: (1) foreign legal
entities, including any company, firm, enterprise, organization or association,
and organizations that are not legal entities, established and authorized to make
investment in accordance with the legislation of the country of their location
(2) foreign individuals, persons without citizenship permanently residing abroad
(3) foreign states (4) international organizations. Foreign investors are entitled to
make investment on the territory of the Russian Federation in the form of shared
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: