Innovatsiya 2021: dolzarb muammolar va zamonaviy yechim

Reference 
1.
Alexandrova A.Yu. International tourism. M .: Aspect Press, 2001. –
464p. 
2.
Alekseeva L.M. Metaphorical terminology and functions of terms in the 
text: abstract of thesis. dis. doc. filol. sciences. Moscow: RUDN, 1999.
– 32 p. 

---

INNOVATSIYA 2021: DOLZARB MUAMMOLAR VA ZAMONAVIY YECHIM 
254 
3.
Vinogradova L.V. The terminology of tourism in the English and Russian 
languages in synchronous and diachronous aspects: abstract of thesis. 
Cand. philol. Sciences: 10.02.19 / Vinogradova L.V. – Veliky Novgorod, 
2011. – 23 p. 
4.
Bekisheva E.V. The specificity of the processes of formation of derivative 
terms (to the problem of national and international in terminological 
subsystems: abstract of thesis. Candidate of Philological Sciences. Saratov, 
1991. – 15 p. 
5.
Moshnyaga, E.V. The terminology system of international tourism as a 
linguocultural phenomenon / E.V. Moshnyaga // Bulletin of the Moscow 
City Pedagogical University. Ser. “Philology. Language theory. Language 
education”. 2009. No. 1 (3). P. 67–73 
6.
Birzhakov MB Introduction to tourism. St. Petersburg: Gerda Publishing 
House, 2001. – 576 p. 
7.
Belan E.T. Formal structural analysis of the terms of international tourism 
in English // Vestnik MGOU. Linguistics series. No. 2. – M., 2007. – S.
92-100. 
THE COMMON CONCEPTS OF TERMINOLOGY
 
Bazarbaev Azamat Barkhramovich
Student of Master’s department 
Uzbekistan State World Languages University
 
An interdisciplinary study
 
is an academic program or process seeking to 
synthesize broad perspectives, knowledge, skills, interconnections, and epistemology 
in an educational setting. Interdisciplinary programs may be founded in order to 
facilitate the study of subjects which have some coherence, but which cannot be 

---

INNOVATSIYA 2021: DOLZARB MUAMMOLAR VA ZAMONAVIY YECHIM 
255 
adequately understood from a single disciplinary perspective (for example, women's 
studies or medieval studies). More rarely, and at a more advanced level, 
interdisciplinarity may itself become the focus of study, in a critique of 
institutionalized disciplines' ways of segmenting knowledge [1]. 
In contrast, studies of interdisciplinarity raise to self-consciousness questions about 
how interdisciplinarity works, the nature and history of disciplinarity, and the future 
of knowledge in post-industrial society. Researchers at the Center for the Study of 
Interdisciplinarity have made the distinction between philosophy 'of' and 'as' 
interdisciplinarity, the former identifying a new, discrete area within philosophy that 
raises epistemological and metaphysical questions about the status of 
interdisciplinary thinking, with the latter pointing toward a philosophical practice that 
is sometimes called 'field philosophy [2]. 
In semiotics, linguistics, sociology and anthropology, 
context
refers to those objects 
or entities which surround a 
focal event
, in these disciplines typically 
a communicative event, of some kind. Context is "a frame that surrounds the event 
and provides resources for its appropriate interpretation" It is thus a relative concept, 
only definable with respect to some focal event within a frame, not independently of 
that frame.