«инглиз тили лексикологияси» кафедраси

 
SEMINARS 11-12. TYPOLOGY OF SYNTACTIC LEVEL OF 
ENGLISH AND NATIVE LANGUAGES 
►
Classroom activities
Exercise №1.
Write some features of a term sentence in Uzbek, Russian and 
English languages and compare them with your classmates. 
Exercise 2.
Discuss with your partner following questions. 
1.
What is aphrase? 
2.
What is asentence? 
3.
What is syntactic typology? 
 
 
 
Uzbek 
Russian
English 

---

154 
 
 
 
 
Exercise 3.
Give examples to syntactical connections: agreement, 
government, and contact in English and Russian languages. 
Languages 
agreement 
government 
contact 
English 
Russian 
_______________________________________________________________________________________________'>Uzbek 
 
 
Exercise 4
. Brainstorm the definitions of phrases in compared languages. 
 
 
Russian
_________________
_________________
_________________
_________________
_________________
_________________
____________ 
 
Uzbek 
__________________
__________________
__________________
__________________
__________________
__________________
___________ 
 
Phrase 
 
English 
_________________
_________________
_________________
_________________
_________________
_________________
___________ 

---

155 
Exercise №5.
Discuss with your group some differences in classifying and 
naming the phrases in compared languages according to the type of 
syntagmatic relations.
English
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Russian 
Uzbek 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Exercise 6.
Work in a small group. Compare and find similarities, 
differences and distinctive features of three types of dependent relation in 
compared languages: agreement, government, and adjoining (contact). Share 
your analysis with other groups. 
Similarities
Differences 
Distinctive features
Agreement 
Government
Adjoining 

---

156 
 
 
Exercise 7
. Proof with your own examples the following comparative analysis 
of phrase. 
1. In English and Uzbek, the adjunct of an attributive phrase can be 
expressed by a passive infinitive. 
E.g.:
______________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________
___________ 
This type of phrase in non-existent in Russian. The idea is rendered by a 
subordinate clause. 
E.g.:
______________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________
___________ 
 
2. The English, the Russianand the Uzbek languages differ significantly 
in 
the means of expressing syntactical connections 
in a phrase. In Russian and 
Uzbek all the three ways of connection are used. In English, the use of 
government and agreement is restricted to the phrases with pronouns. 
E.g.:
______________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________
___________ 
3. In English attributive phrases denoting objects in numerical order, the 
adjunct expressed by a cardinal numeral is in postposition to the kernel 
expressed by a noun. 
E.g.:
______________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________
___________ 
4. In the corresponding Russian and Uzbek phrases, the adjunct 
expressed by an ordinal numeral is in preposition to the headword. 
E.g.:
___________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________

---

157 
______________________________________________________________
______
►