Border Troubles: Urban Nature and The Remaking Of Public or Private Divides

Questions: 
1) "Who or why are the borders regulated"?! 

---

- 2 - 
2) Is it necessary to limit such public forms of nature? 
3) If yes, if it is necessary to limit, how should it be done? 
 
 
For a better understanding, consider the following factors: 
Public parks are provided based on the state budget, some governments are reducing this 
and transferring the costs to the local government budget. Now the local authorities are 
giving such places to "entrepreneurs" to "avoid" large costs or "without money" for large 
costs. As a result, public parks are being privatized and are becoming "commodities". In 
general, there is the question of "property", there are taxes, expenses, control, etc. So, urban 
nature creates the quality of occupying the boundary space between "public and private" 
in the urban environment. 
As a result, it is necessary to treat it through the science of 
urban geography.
Question: What does urban geography mainly study in this matter? 
 
Answer: Urban geography can study: 
1) Explores how urban "nature-based solutions" disrupt public or private boundaries. 
2) It studies how the ideas of the state or private individuals are promoted in the literature 
on urbanization. 
3) Explores the spatiality of the reconstruction of public or private through "urban nature" 
and what its implications are for "urban politics". 
4) What constitutes "public and private" in the urban sphere is considered. 

---

- 3 - 
 
Newcastle Parks Trust – “Urban Green Newcastle” 
The issue
of "demarcation" in this area is also arising mainly against the background of 
"significant reduction of state expenses". Years of the event: 2016-2018. 
The result
: Newcastle's park budget has been cut by around 91%. That is, it was reduced 
from 2.6 million pounds to 87 thousand pounds. As a result, the National Trust and 
Newcastle City Council have developed a "charitable trust model" to preserve the park.