Accidents on Montgomery Road Kill 2 Teens

Download 35.75 Kb.
Hajmi35.75 Kb.
Accidents on Montgomery Road Kill 2 Teens
By Ian Shapira and Phuong Ly

Washington Post Staff Writers

Sunday, November 14, 2004; Page C01
Two teenagers were killed in separate accidents, about three miles and six hours apart, on a narrow stretch of road in Montgomery County, police said yesterday.
Solomon King, 16, of North Potomac died after being struck by a car as he walked with two friends at the 14200 block of Travilah Road in Potomac about 6:45 p.m. Friday, police said. His mother said the Thomas S. Wootton High School junior was headed from a friend's house to a nearby Burger King. Police said the car, described as a Honda Accord with tinted windows, did not stop at the scene and continued west on Travilah Road.
About 1:15 a.m. yesterday, Sarkis George Nazarian Jr., 16, of Potomac was killed when the sport-utility vehicle that he was driving ran off the pavement in the 12500 block of Travilah Road and hit a tree, police said. Police said Sarkis, a junior at Winston Churchill High School, was driving from a party in North Potomac, where they were told by witnesses that he had been drinking.
Police said the party was hosted by a 16-year-old whose parents were out of town. After the accident, police shut down the party and issued citations for underage drinking to 14 teenagers younger than 18.
The deaths are the latest in a string of fatal accidents in the region involving teenagers. In one weekend in September, five teenagers were killed and four others injured in three accidents in Montgomery County.
"How many lives have to go like this?" said Sarkis Nazarian Sr., his voice cracking with grief, surrounded by dozens of friends and relatives in his home yesterday afternoon.
In October, Montgomery police launched a teen driver education program and a public education campaign against teenage drinking.
Toxicology reports were not available on Nazarian, police spokeswoman Lucille Baur said. Police also are investigating how alcohol was obtained for the party, held in the 11900 block of Cragwood Way.
Baur said that Nazarian was driving too fast in the rain and that the road conditions were particularly treacherous. The crash occurred along a narrow, curvy, two-lane road.
Two 16-year-old passengers, Nicholas Hegedus and Scott Alexander, both of Rockville, were treated by paramedics at the scene for minor injuries but did not require hospitalization.
Jeff Nazarian, 28, Sarkis's brother, said he was "very sad" that alcohol may have contributed to the accident.
When Sarkis missed his usual midnight curfew, his father at first didn't worry, because his son had gone out later than usual, about 10:30 p.m., driving the red Jeep Grand Cherokee SUV that he shared with his mother. Sarkis Nazarian Sr. said his son had left later because he had been helping out at the family's store, the Wow Cow ice cream parlor in Bethesda.
"He was a loving, giving person," Nazarian said.
Family members said Sarkis, whose parents emigrated from Syria years ago, had hopes of becoming a dentist and had been talking about opening an ice cream shop near a university to pay for his studies. He was the youngest of five sons and had a 12-year-old sister.
In a nearby neighborhood yesterday, Mieko King was preparing for a memorial vigil for her only child, Solomon. Friends and family gathered at the home last night, putting candles in the yard.
"I hope this is a nightmare," said King, 48, who recalled with tears hugging her son for the last time Friday morning, before he left for school. "I want to wake up from the bad dream. I want to have him back."
Police said the vehicle that struck King may be damaged on the right front or passenger's side. One of the two teenagers walking with King was grazed by the car but did not require treatment.
Classmates at Wootton High School described King as a friendly student who was always joking.
Several of them went to the scene of the accident in the course of the day, leaving behind flowers and a white wooden cross.
"It's hard to know we're going to school on Monday, and we're never going to see him again," said Niki Hetchkop, 15, sobbing. "We heard this stuff happening at other schools, but we never thought it could happen to us."

© 2004 The Washington Post Company

Campaign Urges Parents Not to Give Liquor to Teens

Fliers at County Stores, Tip Line Part of Effort
By David Snyder

Washington Post Staff Writer

Thursday, November 4, 2004; Page GZ03

Montgomery County officials launched a public-education campaign last week to combat teen drinking, focusing on efforts to persuade parents not to provide alcohol for teenage parties.

County officials estimate that about 80 percent of the alcohol consumed by underage drinkers is purchased legally by adults. Nationally, about 65 percent of alcohol drunk by minors is purchased by adults, said George Griffin, director of Montgomery's Department of Liquor Control.
Griffin said the relatively high proportion of minors who get alcohol from adults suggests that the county should target adults who knowingly buy alcohol for minors. In many cases, Griffin said, parents buy alcohol for their teenage children and friends in an effort to control and monitor the drinking, rather than letting the kids drink anywhere.
Officials from the police department and an assortment of county agencies discouraged that practice at a press conference on Shady Grove Road in Rockville.
The slogan for the two-year campaign is "Parents who host lose the most: Don't be a party to underage drinking." Fliers will be distributed through county liquor stores to anyone buying alcohol.
As part of the campaign, officials also launched a tip line for parents and teens, 301-670-SAFE, which is designed to be a sounding board for parents and a tip line for police looking to break up parties where minors are drinking.
The tip line, manned by police officers, is for parents seeking advice on planning parties with teens or on how to lay down ground rules for teens going out to parties.
Similar tip lines have been used to great success in years past, said Officer Bill Morrison, a member of the alcohol enforcement unit. The line had fallen out of use in recent years, and a recent series of fatalities among teenagers in car accidents, at least one of which involved alcohol, helped resurrect it, Morrison said.
In late September, five young people died and four were injured in Montgomery in three accidents in a single weekend. All of the crashes involved excessive speed, police said. The victims were 16 to 19 years old.
Police encouraged parents and teens to use the tip line to prevent further tragedies.
"Not only are the police the enforcers, but we're also parents," assistant chief John King said. "When we have to make that notification, to tell parents that their teenagers are no longer coming home, that is the toughest part of our job."
© 2004 The Washington Post Company
Seeking Ways to Prevent Teen Deaths

Montgomery Students, Parents Discuss Drunken Driving 'Epidemic'

By Darragh Johnson and David Snyder

Washington Post Staff Writers

Wednesday, November 17, 2004; Page B01

Quietly and grimly, nearly 300 Churchill High School parents and students filed into the school's auditorium last night to talk about the recent "epidemic," as one parent called it, of teenagers who drink, drive and die.

"It's been a hard year," Montgomery County police officer Michael Prather told the group. This year, 11 teenagers have died in car accidents in the county. "Alcohol seems to be the underlying issue, oftentimes," Prather said.
The parents gathered because their sons' and daughters' schoolmate, Sarkis George Nazarian Jr., 16, died over the weekend -- about 1:30 a.m. Saturday, after the 1997 Jeep Grand Cherokee he was driving slid off Travilah Road in Potomac and hit a tree. Police have said he and his two 16-year-old passengers, who were slightly injured, had been drinking at an unsupervised party in Potomac in the hours before the accident.
In the days since, parents have been anxious with fear that "he could have been mine," as many said yesterday, and with concern about how to prevent the Nazarians' fate from becoming their own.
But Churchill senior Eric Gussin, 18, reacted with words of warning: "Parents are thinking like parents: We've got to get it to stop," he said. "No matter what you do, no matter what you do, kids are still going to drink. Most will probably still drive. It can't be stopped. It just needs to be limited."
In his blue hockey letter jacket, Gussin stood outside the doors to the auditorium with his younger brother, his aunt and his mother, Marcy Gussin, who said: "You can't stop kids from drinking. But you can stop them from driving."
It remained unclear yesterday whether Nazarian, a junior at Churchill, had alcohol in his system when he died. Police said they had not received toxicology reports from the Maryland medical examiner.
The Potomac party where the teenagers had gathered Friday night was hosted by a girl whose parents were out of town, and she was supposed to be staying elsewhere.
Referring to this, Sara London, who has a 23-year-old daughter and a child at Churchill, stood up and decried the kids who tell their parents, " 'I'm sleeping at A's house,' and A says, 'I'm sleeping at B's house,' and B says, 'I'm sleeping at C's house.' They circle wide, and no one knows where they are. You need to call the parent and say to them, 'Are you going to be there?' "
Another audience member added, "If that had been done that night by all the parents of the children, someone would have found out" that no adults were home.
When Prather told the group that the maximum penalty for providing alcohol to a minor is a $500 fine, one mother asked, "Is it just like a misdemeanor?"
"I believe it's a civil fine," the officer answered.
"A civil fine?" the mother repeated, shocked.
Yesterday, police were continuing to investigate who provided the alcohol to the teenagers at the party, but they had issued no citations, said police spokeswoman Lucille Baur. Fourteen teenagers were cited for alcohol possession when police arrived at the party in the 11900 block of Cragwood Way at 4:30 a.m. Saturday. Police said remnants of 12- and 30-packs of beer were visible when they entered the house to investigate.
One student silenced the auditorium when she stood and said: "You need to know where your kids are. I'm not blaming it just on the parents. Kids are going to lie. They're going to do whatever they want to get alcohol."
Back outside, Eric Gussin agreed that although his mother has picked him up from parties a couple of times, not all of his friends are comfortable with her knowing that they were drinking, too.
And sometimes the peer pressure can be strong for him not to call. It's not uncommon, he said, to hear students say things like, "My mom would kill me if she finds out" -- and the implication is: No parents should find out.
© 2004 The Washington Post Company
Lawsuits target alcohol industry

By Richard Willing, USA TODAY

Consumers' attorneys across the nation have begun to target the alcoholic beverage industry, filing lawsuits that claim that some leading brewers and distillers are using slick advertising to sell products to underage drinkers.
Lawsuits filed since November in Ohio, California, North Carolina, Colorado and Washington, D.C., appear modeled after cases that were brought against the tobacco industry beginning in the mid-1980s. Those suits focused on youth-oriented ads and sought huge damages for tens of thousands of underage smokers and their parents. The tobacco lawsuits led to a settlement in 1998 in which tobacco companies agreed to pay $246 billion to state governments to cover health care costs and other smoking-related expenses.
Some legal analysts say the alcohol lawsuits seem less likely to succeed because of generally positive public attitudes about alcohol and because research has raised doubts about a link between ads and underage drinking.
The lawsuits must also buck what some see as a recent backlash against using the courts to regulate consumer products such as guns and fast food. Claims against makers of those products largely have been unsuccessful, in part because of the difficulty in showing companies' culpability for products that can be used safely.
"Alcohol isn't tobacco ... in the law or in the popular mind," says Jack Calfee, research scholar at the American Enterprise Institute, a business-friendly think tank in Washington. "They're going to have trouble showing a (cause-and-effect) connection" between alcohol ads and underage drinking.
In November, attorneys led by David Boies III of Fairfax, Va., filed suit in state court in Charlotte against brewers Coors and Heineken, distillers Diageo and Bacardi and the makers of Zima and Mike's Hard Lemonade, two flavored alcoholic beverages, or "alcopops." The suit, and nearly identical actions filed later in Cleveland, Denver and Washington, accuse the companies of using a "long-running, sophisticated and deceptive scheme ... to market alcoholic beverages to children and other underage consumers."
A fifth lawsuit, filed in Los Angeles in February, targets major brewers Miller and Anheuser-Busch. The plaintiffs' attorney in that case, Steve Berman, represented Washington state in the tobacco settlement. Berman says his alcohol lawsuit "wholeheartedly" borrows reasoning used in tobacco cases.
Boies' lawsuits allege that alcohol companies place ads in magazines such as Stuff, FHM and Spin that appeal to males under age 21, or in Glamour, which is oriented toward females of similar ages. "In one (Bacardi) ad, a scantily clad young woman is standing on a bar stool pouring a shot of rum down the front of her chest while a young man licks the rum off her exposed midriff," say court papers filed in the Denver case. "The tag line reads, 'Vegetarian By Day. Bacardi By Night.' "
Court papers in the Los Angeles case include copies of six similar alcoholic beverage ads. All are designed to push people younger than 21 to obtain alcohol illegally, the lawsuit claims. The lawsuits also say alcohol companies encourage underage drinking by posting rules for drinking games on company Web sites, and by placing their products in movies aimed at those under 21.
"This is extremely sophisticated marketing that's making an awful lot of money," said Boies, the son of lawyer David Boies II, who represented Al Gore in the dispute over the 2000 presidential election.
The Denver suit cites a Journal of the American Medical Association estimate that underage drinkers in America consumed $22.5 billion worth of alcohol in 1999, or 20% of the U.S. market. The suits were brought on behalf of parents of underage drinkers — or, in the Los Angeles case, by Reed and Lynne Goodwin, whose 20-year-old daughter, Casey, was killed after her car was in a collision with a vehicle driven by an intoxicated teenager. The suits seek class-action damages for thousands of parents whose kids bought alcohol illegally.
The alcohol companies are fighting back. They are trying to have the cases moved from state courts to federal courts. The companies believe federal rules improve their chances by, among other things, making it more difficult for class-action cases to succeed.
Last month in the Charlotte case, the companies cited nine legal bases for dismissing the suit. Among them: The companies said the lawsuit establishes no link between alcohol ads and any drinking by the teenage son of the plaintiffs, Ronald and Andrea Wilson. The ads, the companies say, are commercial free speech protected by the Constitution's First Amendment.
"This lawsuit is a tactic in a social campaign rather than a valid claim for legal relief," argues the companies' attorney, Wood Fay of Charlotte.
The companies note that in a study last year of the relationship between advertising and underage drinking, the Federal Trade Commission found "no evidence of intent to target minors."
The companies say they have spent hundreds of millions of dollars to encourage parents to talk to children about drinking and to train retailers to recognize underage customers. The problem, Miller spokesman Mike Hennick says, is how teens get alcohol — through parents, friends or by using fake IDs. "Lawsuits like this obfuscate the real underlying issues," he says.
Those opposing alcohol companies cite a study by the Center on Alcohol Marketing and Youth, a non-profit interest group in Washington, D.C. The center has found that TV shows popular with teens in 2002 were "filled with alcohol advertising." The number of alcohol ads on TV — 298,381 — rose 39% from 2001, the center says.
Legal specialists say the First Amendment might not protect advertisers if their messages strike judges as deceptive. "You can't predict how lower court judges are going to react," says John Walsh, a New York attorney who has defended corporations sued over ads. "They've often ruled on a gut reaction."
Corrections and clarifications: The original description of a fatal car crash was incorrect. Casey Goodwin, 20, died in March 2003 after her car was in a collision with a vehicle driven by an intoxicated teenager. The story has been changed to reflect the correction.
Find this article at:

Do'stlaringiz bilan baham:

Ma'lumotlar bazasi mualliflik huquqi bilan himoyalangan © 2017
ma'muriyatiga murojaat qiling

    Bosh sahifa