Denting the Universe
The cocktail of low-cost product and premium prices has landed Apple with a
cash pile greater than the GDP of Denmark, the Russian stock market, and
the market cap of Boeing, Airbus, and Nike combined. At some point, does
Apple have an obligation to spend its cash? If yes, then how?
My suggestion: Apple should launch the world’s largest tuition-free
university.
The education market is ripe, and I mean falling-off-the-tree ripe, to be
disrupted. A sector’s vulnerability is a function of price increases relative to
inflation and the underlying increases in productivity and innovation. The
reason tech continues to eat more of the world’s GDP is a gestalt that says we
need to make a much better product and lower price. Education, on the other
hand, has largely remained the same for fifty years and has increased prices
faster than cable, and even health care.
“Do you hear that? It might be the growing sounds of pocketbooks snapping shut and the
chickens coming home ….” AEIdeas, August 2016.
http://bit.ly/2nHvdfr
.
Irrational Exuberance,
Robert Shiller. http://amzn.to/2o98DZE.
I teach 120 kids on Tuesday nights in my Brand Strategy course. That’s
$720,000, or $60,000 per class, in tuition payments, a lot of it financed with
debt. I’m good at what I do, but walking in each night, I remind myself we
(NYU) are charging kids $500/minute for me and a projector. This. Is.
Fucking. Ridiculous.
A degree from a good school is the ticket to a better life, and this ticket is
given almost exclusively to exceptional kids from low-and middle-income
U.S. households, and any kid from a wealthy U.S. or foreign household.
Eighty-eight percent of kids from U.S. households in the top-income quintile
will attend college, and only 8 percent from the lowest. We’re leaving the
unremarkable and unwealthy—most people—behind in a civilization that is
now more Hunger Games than civil.
Apple could change this. With a brand rooted in education, and a cash
hoard to purchase Khan Academy’s digital framework as well as physical
campuses (the future of education will be a mix of off-and online), Apple
could break the cartel that masquerades as a social good but is really a caste
system. The focus should be creativity—design, humanities, art, journalism,
liberal arts. As the world rushes to STEM, the future belongs to the creative
class, who can envision form, function, and people as something more—
beautiful and inspiring—with technology as the enabler.
A key component would be flipping the business model in education,
eliminating tuition, and charging recruiters, as students are broke, and the
firms recruiting them are flush. Harvard could foster the same disruption if
they take their $37B endowment, cancel tuition, and quintuple the size of
their class—they can afford to do this. However, they suffer from the same
sickness all of us academics are infected with: the pursuit of prestige over
social good. We at NYU brag how it’s become near impossible to gain
admission to our school. This, in my view, is like a homeless shelter taking
pride in how many people it turns away.
Apple has the cash, brand, skills, and market opening to really dent the
universe. Or … they could just make a better screen for their next phone.
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: |