Zahiriddin muhammad bobur nomidagi andijon davlat universiteti ingliz tili grammatikasi kafedrasi

In English
S and S; S but S; S or S; S yet S; neither S nor S; S neither S; S nor S; not only S but (also) S; S still S; either S or S; S for S; S so S; S however S; S nevertheless S; S whereas S; now S now S; S hence S; S there­fore S; S then S; S otherwise S; S (or)else S; S then S; S consequently S; S accord­ingly S;
S thus S; first(ly) S second(ly) S; at first S then S; at the beginning S at the end v S; S ant.r. S; S = S; S ~ S; S log.r. S
In Uzbek
S ва S; S аммо S; S бироқ S; S лекин S; S ҳам S; S ҳамда S; ҳам S ҳам S; S ё S; S ёки S; S ёҳуд S; S ёинки S; S ё бўлмаса S; xoҳ, S xoҳ S; S яъни S; на S на S; roғҳ S гоҳ S; дам S дам S; бир S бир S; ҳали S ҳали S; S эса S; S бўлса S; S кейин S; S сўнг S; S унда S; S шунда S; S ўшанда S; S йўқса S; S бўлмаса S; S демак S; S хуллас S; биринчидан S иккинчидан S; аввал S кейин S; аввал S сўнгра S; олдин S кейин S; бошида S охирида S; дастлаб S кейин S; S ant.r. S; S = S; S ~ S; S log.r. S.
A speech sample for each pattern can be found among the above given examples.
So, the main patterns of compound sentences in English 32, in Uzbek 40. This difference is explained by the fact that in Uzbek there more synonymous patterns than in English.

LECTURE 13 (2 hours)
THEME: COMPARATIVE TYPOLOGY OF HYPOTAXEMES WITH SUBJECT, PREDICATIVE, OBJECT AND ATTRIBUTIVE CLAUSES IN MODERN ENGLISH AND UZBEK AND RUSSIAN


Plan:

1. 
   Comparative typology of Hypotaxemes with a Subject Clause.
   
2. 
   Comparative typology of Hypotaxemes with a Predicative Clause.
   
3. 
   Comparative typology of Hypotaxemes with an Object Clause.
   
4. 
   Comparative typology of Hypotaxemes with an Attributive Clause.
   
5. 
   Isomorphic and allomorphic features of Hypotaxemes with a Subject, Predicative, Object and Attributive Clauses in Modern English and Uzbek/Russian).
   
6. 
   Conclusion