- 15 -
2.3.1.2.2 Dynamic bilingual education
According to Garcia (2009), the last type of the bilingual education framework is
dynamic
. This is characterized due to the language interaction support taking place in
different modalities (multimodalities), which allows an interrelationship of the languages
the children have. These multimodalities support the functional interrelationships in the
children’s education, not the separated functional allocation.
In other words, the
functional interrelationship between the two languages of the children, permits the use
of each language according to different purposes, and necessities to deal with into the
context the children are immerse. In view of this, the dynamic framework allows the
creation
of a multiculturalism, which is adapted into the bilingual educational system
through an integral and continuum development of the two languages in the
classroom.
According to (Garcia 2009) in this bilingual education type,
bilingualism is an
important concept, but is not the endpoint since it is only a vehicle to achieve
plurilingualism, which is the main goal of this type of programs. It means that it is
permitted the co-existence of different languages (minority or majority) in the classroom,
which are used in certain moments of the lesson
to develop both languages
simultaneously.
As we have seen during this section, there are different perceptions of the
concept bilingual education. One of them, and the most influent in the 21
st
century is the
one provided by Garcia (2009), in which the conception of
the bilingual education has
changed during the two last centuries. She postulated two different ideologies to
- 16 -
characterize the bilingual education, which are monoglossic and heteroglossic, where
each one of these ideologies is divided in two different theoretical frameworks. These
frameworks are applicable according to the adaptation of the
different societies to the
globalization. According to these, in some societies it is accepted and applicable the
first two frameworks (subtractive and additive), but in some others, this conception and
ideology of a bilingual education is not applicable. In view of this, in this study it will be
relevant to take into consideration the last of the frameworks postulated by this author.
This consists on a dynamic perception of the bilingual education as this framework
allows and respects the use of language minority and majority in the classroom. In other
words, both languages co-exist and are used in certain
moments of the lesson to
develop both languages simultaneously.
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: