1. Current Trends
27
Fig. 1-8: Employment structure of R&D staff in full time equivalents, 2007, 2015 and 2017
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
2007 2015 2017
2007 2015 2017
2007 2015 2017
2007 2015 2017
2007 2015 2017
Total
Business enterprise sector Higher education sector
Government sector
Private non-profit sector
Researchers (total)
Technicians and equivalent staff (total)
Other supporting staff (total)
Percentage of women
amongst researchers
Percentage
of women amongst
technicians and equivalent staff
Percentage of women
amongst other supporting staff
Source: Statistics Austria. Calculations: WPZ Research.
Fig. 1-9: Percentage of female researchers in full time equivalents in OECD countries, 2007 and 2017
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
55%
LV
A
LT
U
ES
T
PRT
GRC
SV
K
ES
P
DN
K
CH
L
IS
L
PO
L
IRL
BE
L
SV
N
HU
N
FR
A
ITA
TUR
SW
E
NED
CZ
E
DEU
LU
X
AU
T
2007
2017
Note: Arranged by proportion of women in 2017. No data are available on the countries omitted. Data for Belgium and Iceland are from 2007 and 2011;
France: 2011 and 2017; Greece: 2010 and 2017; Ireland: 2007 and 2015.
Source: OECD. Calculations and graphic: WPZ Research.
28
Austrian Research and Technology Report 2020
Regional distribution of R&D
The volumes of research carried out vary quite sig-
nificantly between individual federal states. Styria
has the highest
research intensity by far, with 4.87%.
The EU target of three percent is otherwise only met
in Upper Austria and Vienna; in all the other federal
states the research intensity level is below the tar-
get.
9
There is also a disproportionately high number
of young, research-intensive companies (start-ups)
based in the three federal states mentioned.
10
In
absolute terms, over two thirds (69.57%) of R&D
expenditure is accounted for by Upper Austria, Styria
and Vienna. This is a far larger proportion than the
contribution of these three federal states to Austria’s
GDP (55.05%). So Austrian R&D is significantly
over-represented in these states compared to their
economic output, and particularly in Styria. However,
the dominance of Vienna
and Styria has decreased
since 2007 (combined share of R&D in 2007: 55.43%;
9 Values for the individual states are: Burgenland 0.85%, Lower Austria 1.80%, Vienna 3.60%, Carinthia 2.94%, Styria 4.87%, Upper
Austria 3.46%, Salzburg 1.59%, Tyrol 2.88%, Vorarlberg 1.75%.
10 See Keuschnigg and Sardadvar (2019). For a more detailed description of the start-up scene in Austria, see also Leitner et al.
(2019)
https://austrianstartupmonitor.at/en/
of GDP: 38.93%), while the proportion in Upper
Austria has increased.
Fig. 1-10 shows the development of research in-
tensity ratios by region since 2007 in detail. In all
federal states the figures for 2017
are higher than in
2007; the highest growth in research intensity tend-
ed to be in those federal states which had the lowest
levels at the beginning of the observation period.
This trend is documented by the variance in the log-
arithmically calculated research intensity: it de-
creased significantly from 2007 to 2009, and then
more slightly until 2015,
since when it has increased
slightly. Thus despite the consistent increase in re-
search intensity throughout Austria, there is a trend
towards reduced regional differences over time. Ex-
ceptions are Carinthia and Tyrol, at the medium level,
which show low rates of increase
in research intensi-
ty; in both states the research intensity has actually
decreased in recent times.
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: