Module
28
Group Diff erences in Intelligence: Genetic and Environmental Determinants
303
scores have risen signifi cantly—a phenomenon named the Flynn effect after its dis-
coverer, psychologist James Flynn. The Flynn effect is not trivial, with the perfor-
mance of the average 20-year-old today measuring some 15 points higher than the
performance of the average 20-year-old in 1940 (Flynn, 2000, 2007).
The cause of the Flynn effect is not clear. Flynn and a colleague, economist Wil-
liam Dickens, argue that the higher scores have resulted as people have matched
their genetic gifts with their environment. Because society is increasingly complex
and driven by technology, it is increasingly making demands that people with high
intelligence are particularly adept at meeting. Consequently, society provides greater
opportunities for people with high IQs to excel, and that environment pushes them
even more intellectually, creating an increase overall in IQ scores (Dickens & Flynn,
2001; Flynn, 2007).
Other explanations for the Flynn effect suggest that it may due to better nutri-
tion, better parenting, or improvements in the general social environment, including
education. Whatever the cause, the change in IQ scores over the century is not due
to evolutionary changes in human genetics: The period over which the Flynn effect
has occurred is far too short for people to have evolved into a more intelligent spe-
cies (Loehlin, 2002; Sunder Borren, & Tambs, 2008; Lynn, 2009).
PLACING THE HEREDITY–ENVIRONMENT QUESTION
IN PERSPECTIVE
Ultimately, there is no fi nal answer to the question of the degree to which intelligence
is infl uenced by heredity and by the environment. We are dealing with an issue for
which experiments to unambiguously determine cause and effect cannot be devised.
The more critical question to ask, then, is not whether hereditary or environmen-
tal factors primarily underlie intelligence, but whether there is anything we can do
to maximize the intellectual development of each individual. If we can fi nd ways to
do this, we will be able to make changes in the environment—which may take the
form of enriched home and school environments—that can lead each person to reach
his or her potential.
Social and economic inequality, as well
as heredity and other environmental
factors, are associated with diff erences
in intelligence. People who have greater
educational opportunities and who
suff er fewer economic constraints are
able to maximize their intelligence.
feL82795_ch09_276-305.indd Page 303 7/31/10 2:30 AM user-f465
feL82795_ch09_276-305.indd Page 303 7/31/10 2:30 AM user-f465
/Users/user-f465/Desktop
/Users/user-f465/Desktop
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: |