Participants in this experiment again underwent two different conditions, acting
as their own baseline control: four nights of eight and a half hours’ time in bed,
and four nights of four and a half hours’ time in bed. Each day, participants were
limited to the same level of physical activity under both conditions. Each day,
they were given free access to food, and the researchers meticulously counted the
difference in calorie consumption between the two experimental manipulations.
When short sleeping, the very same individuals ate 300 calories more each day
—or well over 1,000 calories before the end of the experiment—compared to
when they were routinely getting a full night of sleep. Similar changes occur if you
give people five to six hours of sleep over a ten-day period. Scale that up to a
working year, and assuming one month of vacation in which sleep miraculously
becomes abundant, and you will still have consumed more than 70,000 extra
calories. Based on caloric estimates, that would cause 10 to 15 pounds of weight
gain a year, each and every year (which may sound painfully familiar to many of
us).
Van Cauter’s next experiment was the most surprising (and devilish) of all. Fit,
healthy individuals went through the same two different conditions as before: four
nights of eight and a half hours’ time in bed, and four nights of four and a half
hours’ time in bed. However, on the last day if each of the experimental
conditions, something different happened. Participants were offered an additional
food buffet stretched across a four-hour period. Set out in front of them was an
assortment of foods, from meats, vegetables, bread, potatoes, and salad to fruit
and ice cream. Set to one side, however, was access to a bonus snack bar filled
with cookies, chocolate bars, chips, and pretzels. Participants could eat as much
as they wanted in the four-hour period, with the buffet even being replenished
halfway through. Importantly, the subjects ate alone, limiting social or
stigmatizing influences that could alter their natural eating urges.
Following the buffet, Van Cauter and her team once again quantified what
participants ate, and how much they ate. Despite eating almost 2,000 calories
during the buffet lunch, sleep-deprived participants dove into the snack bar. They
consumed an additional 330 calories of snack foods after the full meal, compared
to when they were getting plenty of sleep each night.
Of relevance to this behavior is a recent discovery that sleep loss increases
levels of circulating endocannabinoids, which, as you may have guessed from the
name, are chemicals produced by the body that are very similar to the drug
cannabis. Like marijuana use, these chemicals stimulate appetite and increase
your desire to snack, otherwise known as having the munchies.
Combine this increase in endocannabinoids with alterations in leptin and
ghrelin caused by sleep deprivation and you have a potent brew of chemical
messages all driving you in one direction: overeating.
Some argue that we eat more when we are sleep-deprived because we burn
extra calories when we stay awake. Sadly, this is not true. In the sleep-restriction
experiments described above, there are no differences in caloric expenditure
between the two conditions. Take it to the extreme by sleep-depriving an
individual for twenty-four hours straight and they will only burn an extra 147
calories, relative to a twenty-four-hour period containing a full eight hours of
sleep. Sleep, it turns out, is an intensely metabolically active state for brain and
body alike. For this reason, theories proposing that we sleep to conserve large
amounts of energy are no longer entertained. The paltry caloric savings are
insufficient to outweigh the survival dangers and disadvantages associated with
falling asleep.
More importantly, the extra calories that you eat when sleep-deprived far
outweigh any nominal extra energy you burn while remaining awake. Making
matters worse, the less an individual sleeps, the less energy he or she feels they
have, and the more sedentary and less willing to exercise they are in real-world
settings. Inadequate sleep is the perfect recipe for obesity: greater calorie intake,
lower calorie expenditure.
Weight gain caused by short sleep is not just a matter of eating more, but also
a change in what you binge eat. Looking across the different studies, Van Cauter
noticed that cravings for sweets (e.g., cookies, chocolate, and ice cream), heavy-
hitting carbohydrate-rich foods (e.g., bread and pasta), and salty snacks (e.g.,
potato chips and pretzels) all increased by 30 to 40 percent when sleep was
reduced by several hours each night. Less affected were protein-rich foods (e.g.,
meat and fish), dairy items (such as yogurt and cheese), and fatty foods, showing a
10 to 15 percent increase in preference by the sleepy participants.
Why is it that we lust after quick-fix sugars and complex carbohydrates when
sleep-deprived? My research team and I decided to conduct a study in which we
scanned people’s brains while they were viewing and choosing food items, and
then rated how much they desired each one. We hypothesized that changes
within the brain may help explain this unhealthy shift in food preference caused
by a lack of sleep. Was there a breakdown in impulse-control regions that
normally keep our basic hedonic food desires in check, making us reach for
doughnuts or pizza rather than whole grains and leafy greens?
Healthy, average-weight participants performed the experiment twice: once
when they had had a full night of sleep, and once after they had been sleep-
deprived for a night. In each of the two conditions they viewed eighty similar food
images, ranging from fruits and vegetables, such as strawberries, apples, and
carrots, to high-calorie items, such as ice cream, pasta, and doughnuts. To ensure
that participants were making choices that reflected their true cravings rather
than simply choosing items that they thought would be the right or most
appropriate choice, we forced an incentive: after they came out of the MRI
machine, we gave them a serving of the food they told us they most craved during
the task, and politely asked them to eat it!
Comparing the patterns of brain activity between the two conditions within
the same individual, we discovered that supervisory regions in the prefrontal
cortex required for thoughtful judgments and controlled decisions had been
silenced in their activity by a lack of sleep. In contrast, the more primal deep-
brain structures that drive motivations and desire were amplified in response to
the food images. This shift to a more primitive pattern of brain activity without
deliberative control came with a change in the participants’ food choices. High-
calorie foods became significantly more desirable in the eyes of the participants
when sleep-deprived. When we tallied up the extra food items that participants
wanted when they were sleep-deprived, it amounted to an extra 600 calories.
The encouraging news is that getting enough sleep will help you control body
weight. We found that a full night of sleep repairs the communication pathway
between deep-brain areas that unleash hedonic desires and higher-order brain
regions whose job it is to rein in these cravings. Ample sleep can therefore restore
a system of impulse control within your brain, putting the appropriate brakes on
potentially excessive eating.
South of the brain, we are also discovering that plentiful sleep makes your gut
happier. Sleep’s role in redressing the balance of the body’s nervous system,
especially its calming of the fight-or-flight sympathetic branch, improves the
bacterial community known as your microbiome, which is located in your gut
(also known as the enteric nervous system). As we learned about earlier, when
you do not get enough sleep, and the body’s stress-related, fight-or-flight nervous
system is revved up, this triggers an excess of circulating cortisol that cultivates
“bad bacteria” to fester throughout your microbiome. As a result, insufficient sleep
will prevent the meaningful absorption of all food nutrients and cause
gastrointestinal problems.
III
Of course, the obesity epidemic that has engulfed large portions of the world is
not caused by lack of sleep alone. The rise in consumption of processed foods, an
increase in serving sizes, and the more sedentary nature of human beings are all
triggers. However, these changes are insufficient to explain the dramatic
escalation of obesity. Other factors must be at play.
Based on evidence gathered over the past three decades, the epidemic of
insufficient sleep is very likely a key contributor to the epidemic of obesity.
Epidemiological studies have established that people who sleep less are the same
individuals who are more likely to be overweight or obese. Indeed, if you simply
plot the reduction in sleep time (dotted line) over the past fifty years on the same
graph as the rise in obesity rates across the same time period (solid line), shown
in
Figure 13
, the data infer this relationship clearly.
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: |