part of this experiment, otherwise known as daylight savings time.
In the Northern Hemisphere, the switch to daylight savings time in March
results in most people losing an hour of sleep opportunity. Should you tabulate
millions of daily hospital records, as researchers have done, you discover that this
seemingly trivial sleep reduction comes with a frightening spike in heart attacks
the following day. Impressively, it works both ways. In the autumn within the
Northern Hemisphere, when the clocks move forward and we gain an hour of
sleep opportunity time, rates of heart attacks plummet the day after. A similar
rise-and-fall relationship can be seen with the number of traffic accidents, proving
that the brain, by way of attention lapses and microsleeps, is just as sensitive as
the heart to very small perturbations of sleep. Most people think nothing of losing
an hour of sleep for a single night, believing it to be trivial and inconsequential. It
is anything but.
SLEEP LOSS AND METABOLISM: DIABETES AND WEIGHT GAIN
The less you sleep, the more you are likely to eat. In addition, your body becomes
unable to manage those calories effectively, especially the concentrations of sugar
in your blood. In these two ways, sleeping less than seven or eight hours a night
will increase your probability of gaining weight, being overweight, or being obese,
and significantly increases your likelihood of developing type 2 diabetes.
The global health cost of diabetes is $375 billion a year. That of obesity is more
than $2 trillion. Yet for the under-slept individual, the cost to health, quality of life,
and a hastened arrival of death are more meaningful. Precisely how a lack of sleep
sets you on a path toward diabetes and leads to obesity is now well understood
and incontrovertible.
DIABETES
Sugar is a dangerous thing. In your diet, yes, but here I’m referring to that which is
currently circulating in your bloodstream. Excessively high levels of blood sugar,
or glucose, over weeks or years inflicts a surprising harm to the tissues and organs
of your body, worsens your health, and shortens your life span. Eye disease that
can end in blindness, nerve disease that commonly results in amputations, and
kidney failure necessitating dialysis or transplant are all consequences of
prolonged high blood sugar, as are hypertension and heart disease. But it is the
condition of type 2 diabetes that is most commonly and immediately related to
unregulated blood sugar.
In a healthy individual, the hormone insulin will trigger the cells of your body
to swiftly absorb glucose from the bloodstream should it increase, as happens
after eating a meal. Instructed by insulin, the cells of your body will open special
channels on their surface that operate like wonderfully efficient roadside drains at
the height of a downpour. They have no problem dealing with the deluge of
glucose coursing down the transit arteries, averting what could otherwise be a
dangerous flood of sugar in the bloodstream.
If the cells of your body stop responding to insulin, however, they cannot
efficiently absorb glucose from the blood. Similar to roadside drains that become
blocked or erroneously closed shut, the rising swell of blood sugar cannot be
brought back down to safe levels. At this point, the body has transitioned into a
hyperglycemic state. Should this condition persist, and the cells of your body
remain intolerant to dealing with the high levels of glucose, you will transition
into a pre-diabetic state and, ultimately, develop full-blown type 2 diabetes.
Early-warning signs of a link between sleep loss and abnormal blood sugar
emerged in a series of large epidemiological studies spanning several continents.
Independent of one another, the research groups found far higher rates of type 2
diabetes among individuals that reported sleeping less than six hours a night
routinely. The association remained significant even when adjusting for other
contributing factors, such as body weight, alcohol, smoking, age, gender, race, and
caffeine use. Powerful as these studies are, though, they do not inform the
direction of causality. Does the state of diabetes impair your sleep, or does short
sleep impair your body’s ability to regulate blood sugar, thereby causing diabetes?
To answer this question, scientists had to conduct carefully controlled
experiments with healthy adults who had no existing signs of diabetes or issues
with blood sugar. In the first of these studies, participants were limited to sleeping
four hours a night for just six nights. By the end of that week, these (formerly
healthy) participants were 40 percent less effective at absorbing a standard dose
of glucose, compared to when they were fully rested.
To give you a sense of what that means, if the researchers showed those blood
sugar readings to an unwitting family doctor, the GP would immediately classify
that individual as being pre-diabetic. They would start a rapid intervention
program to prevent the development of irreversible type 2 diabetes. Numerous
scientific laboratories around the world have replicated this alarming effect of
short sleep, some with even less aggressive reductions in sleep amount.
How does a lack of sleep hijack the body’s effective control of blood sugar? Was
it a blockade of insulin release, removing the essential instruction for cells to
absorb glucose? Or had the cells themselves become unresponsive to an
otherwise normal and present message of insulin?
As we have discovered, both are true, though the most compelling evidence
indicates the latter. By taking small tissue samples, or biopsies, from participants
at the end of the above experiments, we can examine how the cells of the body are
operating. After participants had been restricted to four to five hours of sleep for a
week, the cells of these tired individuals had become far less receptive to insulin.
In this sleep-deprived state, the cells were stubbornly resisting the message from
insulin and refusing to open up their surface channels. The cells were repelling
rather than absorbing the dangerously high levels of glucose. The roadside drains
were effectively closed shut, leading to a rising tide of blood sugar and a pre-
diabetic state of hyperglycemia.
While many in the general public understand that diabetes is serious, they may
not appreciate the true burden. Beyond the average treatment cost of more than
$85,000 per patient (which contributes to higher medical insurance premiums),
diabetes lops ten years off an individual’s life expectancy. Chronic sleep
deprivation is now recognized as one of the major contributors to the escalation
of type 2 diabetes throughout first-world countries. It’s a preventable
contribution.
WEIGHT GAIN AND OBESITY
When your sleep becomes short, you will gain weight. Multiple forces conspire to
expand your waistline. The first concerns two hormones controlling appetite:
leptin and ghrelin.
II
Leptin signals a sense of feeling full. When circulating levels of
leptin are high, your appetite is blunted and you don’t feel like eating. Ghrelin, in
contrast, triggers a strong sensation of hunger. When ghrelin levels increase, so,
too, does your desire to eat. An imbalance of either one of these hormones can
trigger increased eating and thus body weight. Perturb both in the wrong
direction, and weight gain is more than probable.
Over the past thirty years, my colleague Dr. Eve Van Cauter at the University of
Chicago has tirelessly conducted research on the link between sleep and appetite
that is as brilliant as it is impactful. Rather than depriving individuals of a full
night of sleep, Van Cauter has taken a more relevant approach. She recognized
that more than a third of individuals in industrialized societies sleep less than five
to six hours a night during the week. So in a first series of studies of healthy young
adults of perfectly normal weight, she began to investigate whether one week of
this societally typical short sleep was enough to disrupt levels of either leptin or
ghrelin or both.
If you are a participant in one of Van Cauter’s studies, it feels rather more like a
one-week stay at a hotel. You will get your own room, bed, clean sheets, a
television, Internet access, etc.—everything except free tea and coffee, since no
caffeine is allowed. In one arm of the experiment, you will be given an eight-and-a-
half-hour sleep opportunity each night for five nights, recorded with electrodes
placed on your head. In the other arm of the study, you are only allowed four to
five hours of sleep for five nights, also measured with electrode recordings. In both
study arms, you will receive exactly the same amount and type of food, and your
degree of physical activity is also held constant. Each day, your sense of hunger
and food intake are monitored, as are your circulating levels of leptin and ghrelin.
Using precisely this experimental design in a group of healthy, lean
participants, Van Cauter discovered that individuals were far more ravenous
when sleeping four to five hours a night. This despite being given the same
amount of food and being similarly active, which kept the hunger levels of these
same individuals under calm control when they were getting eight or more hours
of sleep. The strong rise of hunger pangs and increased reported appetite
occurred rapidly, by just the second day of short sleeping.
At fault were the two characters, leptin and ghrelin. Inadequate sleep
decreased concentrations of the satiety-signaling hormone leptin and increased
levels of the hunger-instigating hormone ghrelin. It was a classic case of
physiological double jeopardy: participants were being punished twice for the
same offense of short sleeping: once by having the “I’m full” signal removed from
their system, and once by gaining the “I’m still hungry” feeling being amplified. As
a result, participants just didn’t feel satisfied by food when they were short
sleeping.
From a metabolic perspective, the sleep-restricted participants had lost their
hunger control. By limiting these individuals to what some in our society would
think of as a “sufficient” amount of sleep (five hours a night), Van Cauter had
caused a profound imbalance in the scales of hormonal food desire. By muting the
chemical message that says “stop eating” (leptin), yet increasing the hormonal
voice that shouts “please, keep eating” (ghrelin), your appetite remains unsatisfied
when your sleep is anything less than plentiful, even after a kingly meal. As Van
Cauter has elegantly described to me, a sleep-deprived body will cry famine in the
midst of plenty.
But feeling hungry and actually eating more are not the same thing. Do you
actually eat more when sleeping less? Does your waistline really swell as a
consequence of that rise in appetite?
With another landmark study, Van Cauter proved this to be the case.
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: |