Ministry of higher and secondary special education of the republic uzbekistan state world languages university

Question for self-control:

1. 
   What kind of differences are there in word formation of compared languages?
   
2. 
   Tell the main types of morphological way of word formation?
   
3. 
   How can you define adistinctive feature of English word formation?
   
4. 
   Is there any distinctive feature of Uzbek word formation?
   
5. 
   Tell about general ways of word formation in compared languages.
   

6. The problem of interference in foreign language teaching acquisition (Lexical level).


RecommendedLiteratures:

1. 
   Аракин В.Д. Сравнительная типология английского и русского языков. Ленинград, 1979.
   
2. 
   Буранов Ж.Б. Сравнительнаятипологияанглийскогоитюркскихязыков. М, 1983.
   
3. 
   Валгина Н.С. Современный русский язык. М., 2003.
   
4. 
   Лекант П. А. Современный русский язык. М., 2003.
   
5. 
   Adams V. Introduction into English Wordformation. Lnd., 1983.
   
6. 
   Canon G. Historical Changes and English Wordformation: New Vocabulary items. N.Y., 1986.
   

Topics for self-study

1. 
   Typology of word formation system of the English and Uzbek (Russian) languages.
   
2. 
   Typology of lexical systems.
   
3. 
   Theoretical foundation of Lexical typology.
   
4. 
   Typology of word.
   

LIST OF THE KEY WORDS OF UNDERSTANDING THE COURSE OF COMPARATIVE TYPOLOGY OF ENGLISH AND NATIVE LANGUAGES

Typology of lexical level of English and Native Languages

1. 
   Typology is the study and classification of languages according to structural features, especially patterns of phonology, morphology, and syntax, without reference to their histories.
   
2. 
   Cross-language means relating to languages of different families and types; especially: relating to the comparison of different languages; a plural of phenomenon, a fact, occurrence, or circumstance observed or observable: to study the phenomena of nature.
   
3. 
   Generalisation is the act or process whereby a learned response is made to a stimulus similar to but not identical with the conditioned stimulus.
   
4. 
   Sememe is the capacity for a sign (such as a word, phrase, or symbol) to have multiple meanings (that is, multiple semes or sememes and thus multiple senses), usually related by contiguity of meaning within a semantic field.
   
5. 
   Heterosemy can be seen as a special case of polysemy, with the difference that in polysemy, the related meanings of a form is associated with the same lexeme.
   
6.