Microsoft Word juntunen väitös docx

International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 
8
(4)
, 
611
−
632. 
Juuti, K. & Lavonen, J. (2006). Design-based research in science education: One step towards 
methodology. 
NorDiNa, 4, 
54
−
68. 
Järvikoski, T. (2001). Ympäristötietoisuuden käsitteestä ja ilmiöstä. 
[
About the concept and 
phenomenon of environmental literacy.
]
In E. Jeronen, & M. Kaikkonen (Eds.) 
Ympäristötietoisuus – näkökulmia eri tieteenaloilta 
[
Environmental literacy 
–
interdisciplinary perspectives.
]
pp. 7
−
21. University of Oulu.
Kahn, R. (2008). From education for sustainable development to ecopedagogy: Sustaining 
capitalism or sustaining life? Green theory & praxis: 
The Journal of Ecopedagogy, 4
(1), 
1
−
14. 
Kaiser, F., Wölfing, S. & Fuhrer, U. (1999). Environmental attitude and ecological behaviour. 
Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19, 
1
−
19. 
Kaivola, T. (2007). Sustainable development in teacher education. In T. Kaivola, & L. 
Rohweder (Eds.) 
Towards Sustainable Development in Higher Education – Reflections.
Opetusministeriön julkaisuja 2007:6, 66
−
73. 
Karpudewan, M, Ismail, Z. & Mohamed, N. (2011). Greening a chemistry teaching methods 
course at the school of educational studies, University Sains Malaysia. 
Journal of Education 
for Sustainable Development, 5
(2)
, 
197
−
214. 
Karpudewan, M., Ismail, Z. & Roth, W. (2012). Ensuring sustainability of tomorrow through 
green chemistry integrated with sustainable development concepts (SDCs), 
Chemistry 
Education Research and Practice, 13,
120
−
127. 
Keinonen, T. & Hartikainen, A. (2011). Tiede yhteiskunnassa – Profiles-hanke tukee 
luonnontieteiden opetuksen kehittämistä. 
[
Science in society – Profiles-initiative supports 
development of science education.
]
Dimensio, 1
, 17
−
19. 
Keys, C. & Bryan, L. (2001). Co-constructing inquiry-based science with teachers: Essential 
research for lasting reform. 
Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38
(6)
, 
631
−
645. 
Kipnis, M. & Hofstein, A. (2008). The inquiry laboratory as a source for development of 
metacognitive skills. 
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education
, 6, 
601
−
627. 
Klosterman, M. & Sadler, T. (2010). Multi-level assessment of scientific content knowledge 
gains associated with socioscientific issues-based instruction. 
International Journal of Science 
Education, 32
(8)
, 
1017
−
1043.
Kolstø, S. (2000). Consensus projects: teaching science for citizenship. 
International Journal 
of Science Education
, 
22
(6), 645
−
664. 
Kolstø, S. (2001). Scientific literacy for citizenship: Tools for dealing with the science 
dimension of controversial sosioscientific issues. 
Science Education
, 
85
(3), 291
−
310. 

---

67
Koskela, S., Sokka, L., Korhonen, M-R., Mattila, T. & Soimakallio, S. (2010). 
Elinkaarimetodiikkojen nykytila, hyvät käytännöt ja kehitystarpeet. 
[
Presence, good practices 
and developmental needs of life-cycle methodologies.
]
Antikainen, R. (Ed.). Reports of 
Finnish Environmental Center, 7, 1
−
83. 
Krathwohl, D. (2002). A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy: An Overview.