|
Human development report
2007/2008. Fighting climate change: human solidarity in a divided world.
United Nations
Development Program, New York.
United Nations Environment Program (UNEP), (2007).
Global environmental outlook 4.
United Nations Environmental Program, Nairobi.
75
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), (2009).
United
Nations Decade of Education for Sustainable Development (DESD 2005
−
2014). Review of
Contexts and Structures for Education for sustainable Development Learning for a
sustainable world.
Paris: UNESCO.
US Congress Office of Technological Assessment, (1992).
Executive summary, Green
products by design.
Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
US National Research Council, (1996).
National science educationa standards
. Washington
D.C: National Academy Press.
Van Aalsvoort, J. (2004). Activity theory as a tool to address the problem of chemistry’s lack
of relevance in secondary school chemical education.
International Journal of Science
Education, 26
(13)
,
1635
−
1651.
Van den Akker, J., Gravemeijer, K., McKenney, S. & Nieveen, N. (2006). Introducing
educational design research. In J. van den Akker, K. Gravemeijer, S. McKenney, & N.
Nieveen (Eds.),
Educational design research,
pp. 3–7. London: Routledge.
Vassiliou, A. (2011).
Education in Europe: National Policies, Science Practices and
research.
Euroopan
komissio,
http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/education/eurydice/documents/thematic_reports/133EN.pdf
,
13.6.2013.
Vervaeke, M. (2012). Life Cycle Assessment Software for Product and Process Sustainability
Analysis.
Journal of Chemical Education,
89
, 884–890.
Vilches, A. & Gil-Pérez, D. (2013). Creating a sustainable future: Some philosophical and
educational considerations for chemistry teaching.
Science & Education
,
22
, 1857
−
1872.
Vygotsky, L. (1978).
Mind in society: The development of higher mental processes
.
Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Välisaari, J. & Lundell, J. (2008). Kemian opetuksen päivät 2008: Uusia oppimisympäristöjä
ja ongelmalähtöistä opetusta.
[
Chemistry education days 2008: Novel learning environments
and problem-based teaching.
]
University of Jyväskylä.
Wang, F. & Hannafin, M. (2004).
Using design-based research in design and research
oftechnology-enhanced learning environments.
Article presented in the conference the Annual
meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
Watson M., Lozano R., Noyes C. & Rodgers M. (2013). Assessing curricula contribution to
sustainability more holi- stically: experiences from the integration of curricula assess- ment
and students’ perceptions at the Georgia Institute of Technology.
Journal of Cleaner
Production,
61
, 106–116.
Willamo, R. (2002). Ympäristökasvatuksen peruskysymysten äärellä: Ihminen on osa luontoa
– mikä oikeastaan on ihmisen luontosuhde.
[
At the basic questions of environmental
education: A human is part of the nature – what really is a nature realtionship of a human.
]
Natura, 39
(1), 5
−
9.
76
Wilmes, S. & Howarth, J. (2009). Using issues-based science in the classroom,
The Science
Teacher, 76
(7)
,
24
−
29.
Wolff, L.-A. (2004a). Ympäristökasvatus ja kestävä kehitys: 1960-luvulta nykypäivään.
[
Environmental education and sustainable development: from 1960’s to present.
]
In H.
Cantell, (Eds.)
Ympäristökasvatuksen käsikirja.
[
The handbook of environmental education.
]
pp. 18
−
29. Juva: PS-kustannus.
Wolff, L.-A. (2004b). Tulevaisuuteen tähtäävä kasvatus.
[
Future-orientated education.
]
In H.
Cantell, (2004).
Ympäristökasvatuksen käsikirja.
[
The handbook of environmental education.
]
pp. 209
−
214. Juva: PS-kustannus.
Wolff, L.-A. (2006). Education for sustainable development needs a critical approach. In
Tani, S. (Eds.)
Sustainable development through education. Proceedings of the international
conference on environmental education,
pp. 29
−
46. University of Helsinki.
World Bank, (2009).
World Development Report 2010: development in a changing climate.
World Bank, Washington, DC.
Worldwatch Institute, (2012).
State of the World 2012 – Towards sustainable wellbeing.
Helsinki: Gaudeamus.
World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF), (2012).
Living planet report. Biodiversity, biocapacity
and better choices
.
http://www.wwf.or.jp/activities/lib/lpr/WWF_LPR_2012.pdf
, 4.5.2013.
Wylie, J., Sheehy, N., McGuinness, C. & Orhard, G. (1998). Children’s thinking about air
pollution: a systems theory analysis.
Environmental Education Research
,
4
(2), 117
−
136.
Yager, S., Lim, G. & Yager, R. (2006). The advantages of an STS approach over a typical
textbook dominated approach in middle school science.
School Science and Mathematics,
106
(5)
,
248
−
260.
Yavez, B., Goldman, D. & Peer, S. (2009). Environmental literacy of pre-service teachers in
Israel: a comparison between at the onset and end of their studies.
Environmental Education
Research
,
15
(4),
393
−
415.
Åhlberg, M. (2005).
Integrating education for sustainable development.
Handbook of
sustainability research. pp. 477-504. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Zeidler, D., Sadler, T., Simmons, M. & Howes, E. (2005). Beyond STS: A research-based
framework for socioscientific issues education.
Science Education
,
89
(3), 357
−
377.
Zelezny, L., Chua, P-P. & Aldrich, C. (2000). Elaborating on gender differences in
environmentalism.
Journal of Social Issues, 56
(3), 443
−
457.
Zoller, U. (2012). Science Education for Global Sustainability: What Is Necessary for
Teaching, Learning, and Assessment Strategies?
Journal of Chemical Education
,
89
,
297
−
300.
Zsóka, Á, Szerényi, Z., Széchy, A. & Kocsis, T. (2013). Greening due to environmental
education? Environmental knowledge, attitudes, consumer behaviour and everyday pro-
77
environmental activities of Hungarian high school and university students.
Journal of Cleaner
Production, 48,
126–138.
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: |
