Microsoft Word juntunen väitös docx

International Journal of Science Education, 
31
(4)
, 
551
−
570. 
Governmental program for sustainable development (1998). 
Eduskunnan peraatepäätös 
ekologisen kestävyyden edistämiseksi. 
[
The decision in principle of council of state for 
promoting ecological sustainability 1998.
]
Helsinki: Ministry of Environment. 
Hartings, M. & Fahy, D. (2011). Communicating chemistry for public engagement. 
Nature 
Chemistry, 3, 
674
−
677. 
Heimlich, J. & Ardoin, N. (2008). Understanding behaviour to understand behaviour change: 
a literature review. 
Environmental Education Research, 14
(3)
, 
215
−
237. 
Hendrickson, C. & McMichael, F. (1992). Product design for the environment. 
Environmental 
Science and Technology, 26
(5), 844. 

---

64
Herrington, D., Yezierski, E., Luxford, K. & Luxford, C. (2010). Target inquiry: changing 
chemistry high school teachers' classroom practices and knowledge and beliefs about inquiry 
instruction. 
Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 12,
74
−
84. 
Hesselink, F., van Kempen, P. & Wals, A. (Eds.) (2000). ESDebate: International debate on 
education for sustainable development. Gland: IUCN. 
Hiltunen, J. & Konivuori, H. (2005). 
Vihreä draama: draaman keinoin kestäviin 
elämäntapoihin
. 
[
Green drama: through drama towards more sustainable lifestyle.
]
Vantaa: 
Multikustannus. 
Hines, J., Hungerford, H. & Tomera, A. (1986/1987). Analysis and synthesis of research on 
responsible environmental behavior: A meta-analysis. 
Journal of Environmental Education, 
12
(2)
, 
1
−
8. 
Hjeresen, D., Schutt, D. & Boese, J. (2000). Green chemistry and education. 
Journal of 
Chemical Education, 77
(12), 1543
−
1547. 
Hodson, D. (2014). Learning Science, Learning about Science, Doing Science: Different 
goals demand different learning methods. 
International Journal of Science Education, 36
(15), 
2534–2553. 
Hofstein, A., Eilks, I. & Bybee, R. (2011). Societal issues and their importance for 
contemporary science education – a pedagogical justification and the-state-of-art in Israel, 
Germany, and the USA. 
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9
(6), 
1459
−
1483. 
Hogan, K. (2002). Small groups’ ecological reasoning while making an environmental 
management decision. 
Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39
, 641–368. 
Holbrook, J. (2005) Making chemistry teaching relevant. 
Chemical Education International, 
6
(1)
.
Holbrook, J. (2010). Education through science as motivational innovation for science 
education for all. 
Science Education International
, 
21
(2), 80
−
91. 
Holbrook, J. & Rannikmae, M. (2007). The nature of science education for enhancing 
scientific literacy. 
International Journal of Science Education
, 
29
(11), 1347
−
1362.
 
Holbrook, J. & Rannikmae, M. (2009). The meaning of scientific literacy. 
International 
Journal of Science Education
, 
4
(3), 275
−
288.
 
Hollweg, K., Taylor, J., Bybee, R., Marcinkowski, T., McBeth, W. & Zoido, P. (2011). 
Developing a framework for assessing environmental literacy
. Washington, DC: North 
American Association for Environmental Education. 
Honkanen, S. (2013). Statement: Present values are alluring. 
http://www.chemind.fi/fi/tietoa-
alasta/kestava-kehitys/nykyarvot-vetavat-puoleensa/
, 15.3.2013. 
Hsu, S.-J. & Roth, R. (1998). An assessment of environmental literacy and analysis of 
predictors of responsible envis´ronmental behaviour held by secondary teachers in the 
Hualien area of Taiwan.