Microsoft Word juntunen väitös docx

Itse tehden innostuu oppimaan!
[
Making it yourself awakes your interest 
to learn!
]
Dimensio, 1, 
28
−
31. 
Mikkola, A., Luukka, K. & Ahonen , M-R. (2010). 
Voima. Äidinkieli ja kirjallisuus 8. 
[
Power. Mother language and literature 8.
]
Helsinki: Sanomapro. 
Millar, R. (2006). Twenty first century science: Insights from the design and implementation 
of scientific literacy approach in school science. 
International Journal of Science Education, 
28
(13), 1499
−
1521. 
Millar, R. (2004). The role of practical work in the teaching and learning science, paper 
prepared for the meeting: High school science laboratories: Role and vision national academy 
of 
sciences, 
Washigton 
DC. 
http://www7.nationalacademies.org/bose/millar_draftpaper_jun_04.pdf
,
5.1.2011. 
Ministry of Education. (2009). Strategy of Ministry of Education 2020. Publishments of 
Ministry 
of 
Education 
2009:47. 
http://www.minedu.fi/OPM/Julkaisut/2009/opetusministerion_strategia_2020.html, 
14.1.2010. 
Minner, D., Levy, A. & Century, J. (2010). Inquiry-based science instruction – What is it and 
does it matter? Results from a research synthesis year 1984 to 2002. 
Journal of Research in 
Science Teaching, 47
(4), 474
−
496. 
Mogensen, F. & Schnack, K. (2010). The action competence approach and the ’new’ 
discourses of education for sustainable development, competence and quality criteria. 
Environmental Education Research, 16
(1)
, 
59
−
74. 
Nair, I. (1998). Life cycle analysis and green design: A context for teaching design, 
environment and ethics. 
Journal of Engineering Education, 87
(4), 489
−
494. 

---

70
Negev, M., Sagy, G., Garb, Y., Salzberg, A. & Tal, A. (2008). Evaluating the Environmental 
Literacy of Israeli Elementary and High School Students. 
The Journal of Environmental 
Education,
 39
(2), 
3
−
20. 
Newhouse, N. (1990). Implications of attitude and behavior research for environmental 
conservation. 
The Journal of Environmental Education,
22
(1)
,
26
−
32. 
Nichols, B. (2010). Essential Ecoliteracy, or “earth smarts”: Defining and validating a 
pragmatic educational construct based on quality of life. 
Journal of Sustainability Education,
1(1).
Nieswandt, M. (2007). Student affect and conceptual understanding in learning chemistry. 
Journal of Research in Science Teaching
, 
44
(7), 908
−
937. 
Nikander, S. (2010). Kemian avulla pienempiä jalanjälkiä. 
[
Smaller footprints with the help of 
chemistry.
]
Kemian uutiset, 1
. 
http://www.helsinki.fi/kemia/kemiauutiset/tammikuu.pdf
, 
5.5.2013. 
Näsäkkälä, E., Flinkman, M. & Aksela, M. (2001). Luonnontieteellisen tutkimuksen 
tekeminen 
koulussa. 
Finnish 
National 
Board 
of 
Education. 
http://www.oph.fi/download/49174_luonnontieteellisen_tutkimuksen_teko_ko 
oulussa.pdf
, 
5.5.2011. 
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), (1999). Risk 
management 
of 
installations 
and 
chemicals 
– 
Sustainable 
Chemistry. 
http://www.oecd.org/chemicalsafety/risk-management/sustainablechemistry.html
, 27.5.2013. 
Osborne, J., Erduran, S. & Simon, S. (2004). Enhancing the quality of argumentation in 
school science.