Microsoft Word juntunen väitös docx

Contemporary Trends and Issues in Science Education, 35
, 1
−
294. 
Erduran, S. (2013). Cocktail of Food Science and Argumentation: Shaken or Stirred for 
Learning? 
LUMAT
, 
1
(2), 151–158. 
Eskelinen, T. (2011). 
Kehityksen loppu.
[
The end of development.
]
Helsinki: Into Kustannus. 
Fava, J., Denison, R., Jones, B., Curran, M., Vigon, B., Selke, S. & Bardum, J. (1991). A 
technical framework for life-cycle assessment, Society of environmental toxicology and 
chemistry (SETAC) foundation, Washington, DC. 
Feierabend, T., Jokmin, S. & Eilks, I. (2011). Chemistry teachers’ views on teaching „climate 
change“ – an interview case study from research-orientated learning in teaching education. 
Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 12, 
85
−
91. 
Feierabend, T. & Eilks, I. (2011). Teaching the societal dimension of chemistry using a socio-
critical and problem-oriented lesson plan based on bioethanol usage. 
Journal of Chemical 
Education
, 
88
, 1250–1256. 
Fensham, P. (2004). Increasing the relevance of science and technology education for all 
students in the 21
st
century. 
Science Education International, 15
(1)
, 
7
−
26. 

---

63
Finnish National Board of Education, (2015). Lukion opetussuunnitelman perusteet 2015 / 
Luonnostekstiä 14.4.2015. 
[
The national core curriculum for general upper secondary 
education.
]
http://www.oph.fi/saadokset_ja_ohjeet/opetussuunnitelmien_ja_tutkintojen_perusteet/lukioko
ulutus/lops2016/103/0/lukion_opetussuunnitelman_perusteiden_luonnos_14_4_2015
, 
Helsinki: Finnish National Board of Education. , 23.4.2015. 
Finnish National Board of Education, (2003). Lukion opetussuunnitelman perusteet 2003. 
[
The national core curriculum for general upper secondary education.
]
Helsinki: Finnish 
National 
Board 
of 
Education. 
http://www.oph.fi/download/47345_lukion_opetussuunnitelman_perusteet_20 
03.pdf
, 
15.5.2013. 
Finnish National Board of Education, (2014). Perusopetuksen opetussuunnitelman perusteet 
2004. 
[
The national core curriculum for basic education 2004.
]
Helsinki: Finnish National 
Board 
of 
Education. 
http://www.oph.fi/download/163777_perusopetuksen_opetussuunnitelman_perusteet_2014.pd
f
, 11.5.2015. 
Finnveden, G., Hauschild, M., Ekvall, T., Guinée, J., Heijungs, R., Hellweg, S., Koehler, A., 
Pennington, D. & Suh, S. (2009). Recent developments in life cycle assessment. 
Journal of 
Environmental Management, 91
(1)
,
1
−
21. 
Garcia-Mila, M., Gilabert, S., Erduran, S. & Felton, M. (2013). The Effect of Argumentative 
Task Goal on the Quality of Argumentative Discourse.
 Science Education, 97
, 497–523.
 
Gibson, H. & Chase, C. (2002). Longitudinal impact of an inquiry-based science program on 
middle school students’ attitudes toward science. 
Science Education, 86
(5)
,
693
−
705. 
Gilbert, J. (2006). On the nature of ”context” in chemical education. 
International Journal of 
Science Education, 28
(9)
, 
957
−
976. 
Grace, M. (2006). Teaching citizenship through science: socio-scientific issues as an 
important component of citizenship. 
Prospero, 12
(3)
, 
42
−
53. 
Grace, M. (2009). Developing high quality decision-making discussions about biological 
conservation in a normal classroom setting.