228
Membrane Gas Separation
As known, membranes have become an established technology for CO
2
removal since
1981 (natural gas purifi cation) [10] . The multiple benefi ts of membrane technology prom-
ised by early innovators have been proven in a wide variety of installations around the
world, and one of the world ’ s largest membrane systems for CO
2
removal from natural
gas is the Grissik processing
plant in South Sumatra, Indonesia [11] . The Grissik plant is
a hybrid separation system (membrane plus amine treatment) which offers particularly
attractive operational benefi ts. Thus, it was demonstrated that the most economical
approach is to combine membranes with existing technologies.
Commercial membranes for CO
2
removal are polymer based, and the materials of choice
are cellulose acetate, polyimides, polyamides, polysulfone, polycarbonates, and polyeth-
erimide [12] . The most tested and used
material is cellulose acetate, although polyimide
has also some potential in certain CO
2
removal applications. The properties of polyimides
and other polymers can be modifi ed to enhance the performance of the membrane. For
instance, polyimide membranes were initially used for hydrogen recovery, but they were
then modifi ed for CO
2
removal [13] . Cellulose acetate membranes were initially developed
for reverse osmosis [14] , and now they are the most popular CO
2
removal membrane. To
overcome state - of - the - art membranes for CO
2
separation, new polymers, copolymers,
block copolymers, blends and nanocomposites (mixed matrix membranes) have been
developed [15 – 22] . However, many of them have failed during
application because of
different reasons (expensive materials, weak mechanical and chemical stability, etc.).
In order to design new membrane materials with superior separation performance, low
cost and feasible for massive production, the old work of Kulprathipanja can be consid-
ered as a proper tool [23] . He dispersed polyethylene glycol (PEG) in PDMS and improved
the CO
2
permeability. A similar idea led us to modify or blend existing commercial block
polymers containing ethylene oxide (EO) units with poly(ethylene) glycol [24] ; and thus
by a blending process it was possible to produce high CO
2
- selective membrane materials
with improved permeability.
Permeability of polymers is an important feature for a
broad range of applications
including packaging, bio
-
materials (e.g. for controlled drug release or encapsulating
membranes), barrier materials, high performance impermeable breathable clothing and
membrane separation processes [25 – 27] . Copolymers were considered many years ago,
starting with the most investigated polyurethanes and polyurethane - ureas followed by
polyimides, polyamides and miscellaneous types of block copolymers (e.g. block copoly-
mers containing siloxane segments, hydrocarbon block copolymers and related materials)
[28,29] . Block copolymers offer a great structural versatility which is highly interesting
for a fundamental analysis of permeation through polymeric materials. Systematic struc-
ture/property relationships allow one to design block copolymers
with improved gas
transport properties [30] .
The simplest are diblock copolymers, where two different polymeric chains are bound
together; and with an increase of block number, tri - or multiblocks with a variety of
structures can be obtained [31,32] . Most block copolymers used today are prepared by
living anionic polymerization, which is a feasible method to prepare block copolymers
with controlled architecture. Different polymers do not mix well due to thermodynamic
reasons [33] , especially if their molecular mass is suffi ciently high, they have a strong
tendency to form separated phases.
In block copolymers, this phase separation can occur
only intermolecularly (micro - or nanophase separation) [34] . Those block copolymers