Guide to spelling, punctuation and grammar

A
NALYSIS
Answer to question 1
The answer specifically deals with the intermediate conclusions drawn
and counter-assertions made in the given text and refers to the relevant
sections. The reasons for the intermediate conclusions are analysed and
specific examples given. The final conclusion that is drawn is identified
and the reasons for the conclusion. 
Answer to question 2
The flaws in the argument are stated as being lack of hard evidence and
empty assertions without back-up evidence. The counter-arguments are
characterised as prejudiced and using emotional language. It is pointed
out that there are many dissenting voices but only one scientist is
referred to. The analysis pinpoints the assumption that environmentalists
care more about trees than human beings. Overall, the judgement is
113
13 –S
AMPLE ESSAY
8:
WRITING IN RESPONSE TO A CRITICAL THINKING TASK

---

made that the piece is very partial and polemical rather than objective.