PART II … Capacity Through Education and Training: An African Perspective
kind of expert facilitation, which brings important tacit skills, networks and
approaches to a wider group.
•
Leadership Capacity as Accelerated Experience and Broadened Horizons
This approach emphasizes the need for the public management cadre to be
exposed to greater world and life experiences in an accelerated manner. This
could include travel, placements in other organizations or sectors, professional
exchanges, study visits, or even facilitated community inter-actions. Greater
volume and quality of experience would broaden the intellectual horizons of
the manager and expedite their leadership development.
•
Leadership Capacity as Self Discovery
This approach normally takes the form of facilitated leadership programmes
where the object is to allow for self-discovery and personal growth. Criticized
by some as too “touchy-feely”, the objective is to render managers more open
and astute to their own (and other peoples) strengths and weaknesses, and to
undermine the frequent arrogance and defensiveness characterizing the way
managers wield power. The purpose is to build leadership characteristics such
as humility, listening skills, and the ability to see a situation from points of view
other than your own. Attitudes are expected to change significantly, opening
the way to a path of wisdom.
•
Leadership Capacity as the Shaping of Environments
This perspective places most importance on socializing an entire organizational
environment to enhance leadership growth and development. Teambuilding,
opening up lines of communication within an organization and binding all to
the shared mission are prioritized. The idea here is that institutional leadership
is about trust, common purpose and mutual support.
•
Leadership Capacity as Acculturation to “Chaos”
This approach takes an overtly post-modern stance and sees the Post-Modernist
management leader as operating within a situation of great diversity, complexity
and surprising change. An ability to tolerate ambiguity, to innovate constantly and
find an ethical compass amidst contradictory and seemingly chaotic phenomena is
emphasized. Heightened and constant strategic alertness and continual readiness
for new challenges would define vital leadership characteristics of this new era.
Clearly the above items constitute a semi-arbitrary typology of approaches and
potential leadership development interventions could conceivably combine any or
all of the above. Often, however, one or other of these approaches is hegemonic
and gives a particular direction or spin to the nature of the leadership development
programme and process.
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: |