Chet el sudlari va Xalqaro arbitraj sudlarning qarorlarini tan olish hamda ularni ijro etish muammolari Mundarija I bob. Chet el sudlari va Xalqaro arbitraj sudlarning qarorlarini tan olish hamda ularni ijro etish institutining nazariy

Foydalanilgan adabiyotlar:
I. Milliy normativ huquqiy hujjatlar:

1. 
   O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Konstitutsiyasi.
   Manba: https://lex.uz/docs/-20596
   
2. 
   O‘zbekiston Respublikasining huquqiy yordam ko‘rsatish to‘g‘risidagi xalqaro shartnomalari
   
3. 
   O‘zbekiston Respublikasining Fuqarolik protsessual kodeksi. Manba: https://lex.uz/docs/-3517337
   
4. 
   O‘zbekiston Respublikasining Iqtisodiy protsessual kodeksi. Manba: https://lex.uz/acts/-3523891
   
5. 
   “Xalqaro tijorat arbitraji to‘g‘risida”gi O‘RQ-674-sonli 16.02.2021 yildagi O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Qonuni.
   Manba: https://lex.uz/docs/-5294106
   
6. 
   “Sud hujjatlari va boshqa organ hujjatlarini ijro etish to‘g‘risida”gi O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Qonuni.
   Manba: https://lex.uz/acts/-26477
   

II. Xorijiy davlatlarning normativ huquqiy hujjatlari.

7. 
   Korea Respublikasi Fuqarolik protsessual kodeksi. Manba: https://elaw.klri.re.kr/eng_service/lawView.do?hseq=38478&lang=ENG
   
8. 
   Xitoy Xalq Respublikasi Fuqarolik protsessual kodeksi. Manba: http://www.npc.gov.cn/zgrdw/englishnpc/Law/2007-12/12/content_1383880.htm#:~:text=Article%202%20The%20Civil%20Procedure,affirm%20civil%20rights%20and%20obligations%2C
   
9. 
   Braziliya Respublikasi Fuqarolik protsessual kodeksi. Manba: https://www.lawyerinbrazil.com/articles/brazilian-civil-procedure-code-in-english/
   

III. O‘quv qo‘llanmalari va adabiyotlar.

1. 
   Emerson F. D. History of arbitration practice and law //Clev. St. L. Rev. – 1970. – Т. 19. – С. 155.
   
2. 
   Drahozal C. R., Friel R. J. Consumer Arbitration in the European Union and the United States //NCJ Int'l L. & Com. Reg. – 2002. – Т. 28. – С. 357.
   
3. 
   United Nаtiоns Cоnventiоn оn the Recоgnitiоn аnd Enfоrcement оf Fоreign Аrbitrаl Аwаrds, 1958, UN DОC/E/CОNF.26/8/Rev.1 (“New Yоrk Cоnventiоn”).
   
4. 
   Koritzinsky A. R., Welch Jr R. M., Schlissel S. W. The benefits of arbitration //Fam. Advoc. – 1991. – Т. 14. – С. 45.
   
5. 
   Henderson A. 'Lex arbitri', procedural law and the seat of arbitration: Unravelling the laws of the arbitration process //Singapore Academy of Law Journal. – 2014. – Т. 26. – №. Special Ed. – С. 886-910.
   
6. 
   Farnsworth E. A. UNCITRAL-Why? What? How? When? //The American Journal of Comparative Law. – 1972. – С. 314-322.
   
7. 
   Farnsworth E. A. UNCITRAL-Why? What? How? When? //The American Journal of Comparative Law. – 1972. – С. 314-322.
   
8. 
   Born G. B. International commercial arbitration. – Kluwer Law International BV, 2020.
   
9. 
   Franck, Susan. "The role of international arbitrators." ILSA J. Int'l & Comp. L. 12 (2005): 499.
   
10. 
    c (ed.). Institutional arbitration: a commentary. – Bloomsbury Publishing, 2013
    
11. 
    Arkin H. L. International ad hoc Arbitration: A practical Alternative //Int'l Bus. Law. – 1987. – Т. 15. – С. 5
    
12. 
    Русакова Е. П. Порядок рассмотрения финансовых споров в Китайской международной Торгово-Экономической арбитражной комиссии (China International Economic and Trade arbitration Commission-CIETAC) //Пробелы в российском законодательстве. Юридический журнал. – 2016. – №. 6. – С. 52-54.
    
13. 
    Wolff, R. (ed.), New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards of 10 June 1958: Article-by-Article Commentary, 2nd ed., 2019.
    
14. 
    Elkouri, F., Elkouri, E. A., Ruben, A. M., American Bar Association, & Employment Law. (1960). How arbitration works (p. 188). BNA
    
15. 
    Stipanowich, Thomas J. "Arbitration: The new litigation." U. Ill. L. Rev. (2010): 1.
    
16. 
    Rederi Aktiebolaget Sally v. srl Termarea, Corte di Appello, Florence, 13 April 1978, Yearbook Commercial Arbitration IV (1979) pp. 294-296.
    
17. 
    Kronke, Herbert, Patricia Nacimiento, and Dirk Otto. Recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards: a global commentary on the New York Convention. Kluwer Law International BV, 2010.
    
18. 
    Tiryakioğlu B., Canyaş A. B. Challenges to arbitral awards //Arbitration in Turkey. – Kluwer Law International, 2015. – С. 183-210.
    
19. 
    Collins M. Privacy and confidentiality in arbitration proceedings //Tex. Int'l LJ. – 1995. – Т. 30. – С. 121.
    
20. 
    Hopt K. J., Steffek F. (ed.). Mediation: Principles and regulation in comparative perspective. – Oxford University Press, 2013.
    
21. 
    Nozimxon o‘g‘li a. x. Fuqarolik protsessual huquqi. xo ‘jalik protsessual huquqi. hakamlik jarayoni va mediatsiya //o'zbekistonda fanlararo innovatsiyalar va ilmiy tadqiqotlar jurnali. – 2022. – т. 1. – №. 8. – с. 29-34.