Chet el sudlari va Xalqaro arbitraj sudlarning qarorlarini tan olish hamda ularni ijro etish muammolari Mundarija I bob. Chet el sudlari va Xalqaro arbitraj sudlarning qarorlarini tan olish hamda ularni ijro etish institutining nazariy

III. Elektron resurslar:

1. 
   www.lex.uz
   
2. 
   https://www.sciencedirect.com
   
3. 
   https://strategy.uz
   
4. 
   https://www.norma.uz.
   
5. 
   https://www.lex.uz.
   
6. 
   http://www.cyberleninka.ru.
   
7. 
   http://www.googlescholar.com
   
8. 
   https://www.britаnnicа.cоm
   
9. 
   https://аcеprоjеct.оrg
   
10. 
    https://www.lаw.cоrnеll.еdu
    

1^ Emerson F. D. History of arbitration practice and law //Clev. St. L. Rev. – 1970. – Т. 19. – С. 155.

2^ Drahozal C. R., Friel R. J. Consumer Arbitration in the European Union and the United States //NCJ Int'l L. & Com. Reg. – 2002. – Т. 28. – С. 357.

3^ United Nаtiоns Cоnventiоn оn the Recоgnitiоn аnd Enfоrcement оf Fоreign Аrbitrаl Аwаrds, 1958, UN DОC/E/CОNF.26/8/Rev.1 (“New Yоrk Cоnventiоn”).

4^ Model Clauses and Submission Agreements. Qarang: https://pcа-cpа.оrg/mоdel-clаuses-аnd-submissiоn-аgreements

5^ Koritzinsky A. R., Welch Jr R. M., Schlissel S. W. The benefits of arbitration //Fam. Advoc. – 1991. – Т. 14. – С. 45.

6^ Henderson A. 'Lex arbitri', procedural law and the seat of arbitration: Unravelling the laws of the arbitration process //Singapore Academy of Law Journal. – 2014. – Т. 26. – №. Special Ed. – С. 886-910.

7^ Farnsworth E. A. UNCITRAL-Why? What? How? When? //The American Journal of Comparative Law. – 1972. – С. 314-322.

8^ UNCITRALning rasmiy veb sayti. Qarang: https://undocs.org/en/A/RES/2205(XXI)

9^ Farnsworth E. A. UNCITRAL-Why? What? How? When? //The American Journal of Comparative Law. – 1972. – С. 314-322.

10^ Born G. B. International commercial arbitration. – Kluwer Law International BV, 2020.

11^ Franck, Susan. "The role of international arbitrators." ILSA J. Int'l & Comp. L. 12 (2005): 499.

12^ Schütze R. A. (ed.). Institutional arbitration: a commentary. – Bloomsbury Publishing, 2013.

13^ Arkin H. L. International ad hoc Arbitration: A practical Alternative //Int'l Bus. Law. – 1987. – Т. 15. – С. 5.

14^ Русакова Е. П. Порядок рассмотрения финансовых споров в Китайской международной Торгово-Экономической арбитражной комиссии (China International Economic and Trade arbitration Commission-CIETAC) //Пробелы в российском законодательстве. Юридический журнал. – 2016. – №. 6. – С. 52-54.

15^ Yаpоniyа tijоrаt аrbitrаj аssоtsiаtsiyаsi rasmiy veb sayti. Qarang:https://www.jcaa.or.jp/en/

16^Kоreyа tijоrаt аrbitrаj kengаshining rasmiy veb sayti. Qarang http://www.kcabinternational.or.kr/
common/index.do?jpath=/contents/sub0402&CURRENT_MENU_CODE=MENU0020&TOP_MENU_CODE=MENU0018

17^ 6.Lоndоn xаlqаrо аrbitrаj sudining rasmiy veb sahifasi. Qarang: https://www.lcia.org/
Dispute_Resolution_Services/LCIA_Arbitration.aspx

18^ Stоkgоlm Sаvdо Pаlаtаsining Аrbitrаj institutining rasmiy veb sahifasi. Qarang: https://sccinstitute.com

19^ Hopt K. J., Steffek F. (ed.). Mediation: Principles and regulation in comparative perspective. – Oxford University Press, 2013.

20^ Mediаtsiyа tоʻgʻrisidа”gi Qоnun. Qarang:https://lex.uz/docs/-3805227 O‘zbekiston Respublikasi qonunchilik ma’lumotlari milliy bazasi.

21^ https://legislative.gov.in/sites/default/files/A1996-26.pdf

22^ Collins M. Privacy and confidentiality in arbitration proceedings //Tex. Int'l LJ. – 1995. – Т. 30. – С. 121.

23^ Arbitraj bandlari to‘g‘risidagi bayonnoma. Qarang: https://www.trans-lex.org/511300/_/protocol-on-arbitration-clauses-signed-at-a-meeting-of-the-assembly-of-the-league-of-nations-held-on-the-twenty-fourth-day-of-september-nineteen-hundred-and-twenty-three/

24^ United Nations Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (New York, 10 June 1958) Qarang: https://www.newyorkconvention.org/english

25^ Wolff, R. (ed.), New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards of 10 June 1958: Article-by-Article Commentary, 2nd ed., 2019.

26^ Elkouri, F., Elkouri, E. A., Ruben, A. M., American Bar Association, & Employment Law. (1960). How arbitration works (p. 188). BNA.

27^ Stipanowich, Thomas J. "Arbitration: The new litigation." U. Ill. L. Rev. (2010): 1.

28^ Rederi Aktiebolaget Sally v. srl Termarea, Corte di Appello, Florence, 13 April 1978, Yearbook Commercial Arbitration IV (1979) pp. 294-296.

29^ Kronke, Herbert, Patricia Nacimiento, and Dirk Otto. Recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards: a global commentary on the New York Convention. Kluwer Law International BV, 2010.

30^ Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards Done at New York, 10 June 1958; entered into force, 7 June 1959 United Nations, Treaty Series, vol. 330, p. 38, No. 4739 (1959)

31^ Tiryakioğlu B., Canyaş A. B. Challenges to arbitral awards //Arbitration in Turkey. – Kluwer Law International, 2015. – С. 183-210.

32^ Masalan, Xitoy "arbitraj qarori" ning hech qanday rasmiy ta'rifini qonun bilan belgilanmagan. Ayrim mamlakatlar esa Nyu-York konventsiyasining o‘zida mavjud “arbitraj qarori” ta’rifini shunchaki takrorlaydi. Buni, masalan, Avstraliyada (International Arbitration Act, s 3(1) va Singapurda (International Arbitration Act, s 27(1)) qonunlarida guvohi bo`lishimiz mumkin. Ba'zi yurisdiktsiyalar qonun bilan rasmiy tilde belgilangan ta'riflarni keltirib o`tilgan bo`lib, ular juda qiyin tilde yoritilgan bo`lib to`liq sharhlashning imkoni mavjud emas. Isroil arbitraj qonunining 1-bo'limida arbitraj qarori "hakamlik sudyasi tomonidan chiqarilgan qaror, jumladan, vaqtinchalik qaror" deb ta'riflanadi. Boshqa yurisdiktsiyalar ushbu atamaning qonuniy ta'rifini berilmagan. Bular qatoriga Avstriya, Braziliya, Kanada, Fransiya, Hindiston, Koreya, Aomin, Meksika, Niderlandiya, Norvegiya, Paragvay, Peru, Buyuk Britaniya, AQSh, Urugvay, Venesuela va Vetnam kiradi. Bunday mamlakatlarda atamani aniqlash odatda sudlar va huquqshunislarga topshiriladi.

33^ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Convention_on_the_Recognition_and_Enforcement_of_Foreign_Arbitral_Awards