Ч а с т ь V i главный редактор

474
«Молодой учёный» . № 4 (294) . Январь 2020 г.
Филология, лингвистика
Филология, лингвистика
and grammatical similarity with Uzbek interjections. At the 
same time, Chinese interjections have original functional 
and grammatical characteristics that allow us to talk about 
the differential parameters of this category of words in the 
classification aspects.
The functional approach focuses on comparing the 
functional, semantic and classifying characteristics of Chinese 
interjections of various ranks. Typology of interjection in 
Chinese language allows us to establish that these linguistic 
elements are able to represent not only a wide range of 
emotionally expressive characteristics, but also signs of 
logical operations of the subject, for example, expression 
of doubt, hesitation, reflection of the speaker, consent 
or disagreement of the author of the statement with the 
opponent, understanding the subject of the speech situation of 
communication, short answers to what was said, the authors 
of the expression of expression, depending on the situation of 
the use of interjection in communication.
The traditional linguistic approach defines interjection 
according to a grammatical aspect. In this regard, both 
Chinese and Uzbek interjections have similar status 
grammatical characteristics of non-significant and unofficial 
parts of speech of the corresponding language systems, which, 
from the syntactic point of view, do not perform grammatical-
structural functions in the sentence structure. Due to these 
characteristics, in linguistic science, the classification 
of interjections by semantic attribute is widespread. In 
Linguistics, many linguists adhere to this approach — 
马建忠
M
ǎ
Jiànzhōng
[3], 
王力
Wáng Lì
[4], 
黎锦熙
Lí Jǐnxī [5], and 
others. There are two ideas to the definitions of interjections 
in Chinese study. One in defined from semantics. 
马建忠
M
ǎ
 
Jiànzhōng
, a Chinese linguist, said: “words which are used 
to express feelings of one’s mind are called interjections”.
马建忠
M
ǎ
 Jiànzhōng
classifies interjections according to 
their semantic attributes. The other is defined from its syntax 
characteristics. 
王力
Wáng Lì
said: “the interjections are not