– 109 –
opment. Integration of disciplines in the modern school - this is one of the directions of the search
for new pedagogical solutions, the development of creative potential of pedagogical teams in order
to influence students effectively and rationally. Integration aids in the dispersal and mosaic of stu
-
dents’ knowledge, as well as their acquisition of holistic knowledge and a set of universal values.
Pedagogical disciplines both local and foreign have extensive experience of studying integration
issues. J.A. Comenius, I.G. Pestalozzi, J.J. Russo, L.N. Tolstoy, K.D. Ushinsky suggested the task
of using interdisciplinary communication in the educational process. The ability to perceive and un-
derstand information decreases dramatically with the rapid growth of information. The way forward
is to summarize the various subjects, develop integrated training courses, and link all disciplines of
the school. There is no consensus today
about what integration is, even if it has always been the idea
itself. Regarding the integrated education problem, V.I. Vernadsky writes: “The twentieth centu-
ry’s development of scientific knowledge. The boundaries of each discipline are breached quickly.
Instead of science, we increasingly focus on issues. On the one hand, this allows us to examine the
phenomenon studied more deeply and, on the other, to broaden its coverage throughout.” I propose a
trip to the past. The roots are back to the 18th century. The lesson is integrated. “All that is connected
in the same way must be taught” (Ya.A. Kamensky). Criticizing Comenius’ class-lesson system for
not being consistent in the study of individual subjects and the formal-logical connections between
them, its founders advocated for the integration of learning around processes and events that children
found interesting and natural. provided a way to connect with life’s situations Russo was among the
first to raise this issue. His French disciples, Carpentier and Robin, created a number of programs
of “integral learning” and schooling in which manual labor was central to education. All subsequent
“theoretical” research was gradually built around this work.
Johann Friedrich Herbart, one of the
founders of experimental psychology and didactics in Germany, defended the complex method. He
believed that geography, the “science of the unifying nature,” was at the heart of education, and that
it was natural to combine mathematics, history, and natural science around it. Rudolf Steiner was
the last major German theorist to support the complex method. His “periods” evolved into distinct
forms of education in which children were immersed in culture, science, or crafts. The extraordinary
“complexist” Jean-Ovid Decroli also had a significant impact on the formation of Belgium’s state
education system. In 1907, he founded the School of Life through Life in Brussels, which organized
education around “centers of the child’s interest.” In short, complex, “holistic” pedagogical ideas
have a far more serious and glorious foreign history. The “lessons of thinking in nature” that V.O.
Sukhomlinsky taught to 6-year-olds at the Pavlysh pile are an example of his experience. The combi-
nation of these fundamental types of cognitive activity (observation, thinking, and speech) is intended
to teach, educate, and develop children. The propaedeutic path is combined with
the one proposed
by K.K. Ushinsky... It is the diversity of primary education subjects, if it does not include any sepa-
rate subject and everything feeds the activities of children, and all of this diversity wrote that it can
only be added to a single rational influence of the adults who manage the activity. The concept of
combining separate areas of scientific knowledge - Russian language and literature, natural sciences,
and history - was first developed in “Children’s World,” which was intended as a book for reading
in the lower grades of high school (gymnasium and district). It was planned. The first section of the
history of patriotism covers the section “First acquaintance with the Motherland,” while the second
section covers the section “From Russia’s history.” The historical sections of Detsky Mir are made
up of stories that provide chronological information about the Russian state’s political history and
culture. K.D. Ushinsky began reworking the “Children’s World” elementary school, but his work
was far from finished. K.D. Ushinsky wrote in developing the idea of integrated education in primary
school that when different subjects are added to a single propaedeutic course, it should not be lost. In-
dividuality of individual subjects can be realized by teaching such a course in a single teacher, rather
than a team of science teachers. Our time period is defined by a convergence of sciences, as well as a
desire to have the most accurate picture of the overall picture of the world. These ideas are reflected
in the modern school education concept. However, such a problem cannot be solved within the scope
of a single scientific discipline. As a result, there is a trend toward integrating academic disciplines
– 110 –
in teaching theory and practice (integrated courses, integrated lessons), which allows students to
achieve interdisciplinary generalizations and get closer to understanding the big picture of the world.
It is becoming more popular. The evolution of any science, including methodology, is
inextricably
linked to the formation of terminology. It is not surprising, then, that new word names appear in the
methodology from time to time, such as researcher, researcher, innovator, teaching optimization,
and so on. The integration of these disciplines is the most recent innovation of this type, which was
popular in the 1990s. What, as a term and phenomenon, is methodologically integrated? A learning
lesson for parents that is methodologically integrated. In the teaching and learning process, integrated
lessons are becoming increasingly important. They instill a creative spirit in the classroom and restore
children’s joy of reading as well as their confidence in themselves and in life. Let us now discuss
the factors that influence the efficacy of integrated lessons. First, let’s determine which lessons are
better suited for integration. These lessons are based on the similarity of the content of the leading
topics in various subjects as well as their logical connections. Currently, the issue of integrated ed-
ucation is contentious, because, according to T.V. Varenova, integration has
both advantages and
disadvantages. It is a good thing that children with special educational needs are not isolated from
society, but it is a bad thing that special integrated education opportunities in public schools are lim-
ited. However, the views of parents with varying attitudes toward integration should be considered,
particularly in its mandatory version. It is therapeutic and rehabilitation, in addition to the direction
of education, correction, and compensation, which is impossible to fully achieve in a public school.
Private schools have vocational training workshops that are not available in public schools. Keeping
a child in a private school costs the state 3-5 times more than keeping a child in a public school, but
supporters argue that the costs are justified. According to the Russian authors, the difficulties in the
transition to integration (Nazarova N.M., Goneev A.D., etc.) are related to financial and economic is
-
sues; non-compliance of state standards of higher special education with the requirements of modern
special (correctional) school and complex education of children with developmental problems; and a
lack of the necessary regulatory framework.
As a
conclusion one can say that, it will be effective if every teacher in the education system is
based on lesson integration. As a result, the teacher collaborates with the colorful and engaging slides
to make the subject more in-depth and unique. Each lesson is unique, and as a result, students learn
more effectively. Recognizes the interconnectedness of science.
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: